Bill Moyers Retiring From TV Journalism

"I was just in the editing room, working on the last piece," Bill Moyers says. "I thought: `I've done this so many times, and each one is as difficult as the last one.' Maybe finally I've broken the habit."

It hasn't been so much a habit for Moyers as a truth-telling mission during his three decades as a TV journalist. But come next week, he will sign off from "Now," the weekly PBS newsmagazine he began in 2002, as, at age 70, he retires from television.

"I'm going out telling the story that I think is the biggest story of our time: how the right-wing media has become a partisan propaganda arm of the Republican National Committee," says Moyers. "We have an ideological press that's interested in the election of Republicans, and a mainstream press that's interested in the bottom line. Therefore, we don't have a vigilant, independent press whose interest is the American people."

For that, his absence after the Dec. 17 "Now" will be all the more keenly felt: Moyers' interest has always been the American people.

A humanist who's at home with subjects ranging from the power of myth to media consolidation, from drug addiction to modern dance, from religion to environmental abuse, Moyers has produced hundreds of hours of diverse programming on issues that others shortchange, sidestep or simply fail to notice. And through it all, he has looked upon his audience not as targeted consumers, or as voters split along a Red State-Blue State divide, but as his fellow citizens.

He's a citizen-journalist with a robust background, this Texas native who, early on, earned a divinity degree (he's an ordained Baptist minister) then served as special assistant to President Johnson, and for several years was publisher of the Long Island newspaper Newsday.

In 1971, he came to public television as host of "This Week" and "Bill Moyers' Journal," and, next, joined CBS News to do similarly civic-minded programming.

Then in 1986 he and his wife, Judith Davidson Moyers, became their own bosses by forming Public Affairs Television, an independent shop that has not only produced documentaries such as "A Walk Through the 20th Century," "Healing and the Mind" and "A Gathering of Men with Robert Bly," but also paid for them through its own fund-raising efforts.

"Judith and I will take several months to catch our breath," says Moyers during a recent conversation at the soon-to-be-vacated office he rents at Thirteen/WNET's Manhattan headquarters. "Then I will think about the Last Act _ capital L, capital A _ of my life."

He does have one immediate project: a book he will write about his years with Johnson. But he has no TV ventures in mind.

With his days at "Now" ticking down, Moyers voices pride in that series, which, upon its premiere three years ago, he envisioned as "a flexible format for ideas and conversation, reportage and debate." Now reaching 2.4 million viewers weekly with its breaking-news currency and contemplative pace, "Now" will continue with his worthy co-host, David Brancaccio, taking over. (It airs Fridays at 8:30 p.m. EST; check local listings.)

"It has gained traction," says Moyers _ if only by default, in an era where most TV journalism gravitates toward the sensational or trivial. "As the networks have raced to the bottom, it is very easy to stand out if you just do good journalism. We've been trying to do good journalism, and it filled a real void."

One example of typically good journalism on "Now" not long ago: an in-depth look at the record of President Bush's nominee for secretary of state, Condoleeza Rice, who in her current post as national security adviser "dreadfully misjudged the terrorist threat leading up to 9/11, and then misled America and the world about the case for invading Iraq," as Moyers concluded.

It was the sort of report unlikely to be found on most newscasts, and even less likely to endear a reporter to the powers-that-be, on whose good graces the media has grown all too reliant. But Moyers believes that challenging those in power is a journalist's duty _ and, consequently, his.

"What they're really objecting to is not my ideology," he says in his thoughtful, almost pastoral manner. "I'd be doing this if the Democrats were in power. It's not that I'm a liberal, it really isn't. It's the fact that I'm doing journalism that isn't determined by the establishment.

"You don't get rewarded in commercial broadcasting for trying to tell the truth about the institutions of power in this country," he goes on. "I think my peers in commercial television are talented and devoted journalists, but they've chosen to work in a corporate mainstream that trims their talent to fit the corporate nature of American life. And you do not get rewarded for telling the hard truths about America in a profit-seeking environment."

Through his own devices, Moyers has been the journalist he wanted to be, while honored for it with more than 30 Emmys and 10 Peabody awards.

"I've just been doing the kind of journalism that ought to be done, IF you had the opportunity to do it," he insists. "The fight has been to create that opportunity and that independence."

It's been a fight he fought well. But where will tomorrow's Bill Moyers come from?

"We have got to nurture the spirit of independent journalism in this country," he warns in reply, "or we'll not save capitalism from its own excesses, and we'll not save democracy from its own inertia."
___
Couldn't agree with him more. "One must realize that Fox News is an adjunct of the Republican party." -Bernie Sanders Vermont-Independent

That's too bad, he was an honest man.

However, I don't think 'Conservitive Media' is at all the biggest story of our time. I don't even think that's accurate.

I agree, although its good to turn this argument around, because in reality the media was never liberal at all. Compared to some of the question asked by journalists in the 60s and 70s, stuff today is pretty tame.

Let me clairfy, the second bold was what I was commenting on completely agreeing with. The first bolded part was something that needs to be looked at much closer, but you guys are right it's not the "...biggest story of our time..."

No, the mainstream media isn't liberal at all.

It's nice to see that a liberal who's not liberal thinks Rush Limbaugh is the biggest story of our time...

I think its more than just Rush Limbaugh...you look at who controls the media, the private sector, and who is aligned to the private sector? Where do politicians get most of their campaign money from? Its not just Republicans of course, but all polticians. As citizens, we should be very wary of this. This is absolutely the truth, its no "conspiracy."

Media in general has a money bias, and that's it. There are not many networks out there saying "Lets screw the republicans today." They are reporting stories that will get people to watch and keep watching. Ratings. A report that the president is getting blowjobs will sell the news. But a report that the president blew it after 9/11 will not, because people don't want to hear that. It's whatever sells.

Well, in reality it boils down to Rush. He's the one that started the new media. If not for Rush, there would be no Hannity, or Savage, or Beck. There would be no FoxNews. There would be no Worldnetdaily, or Right Wing News. Nothing...it would just be the same old liberal media full of people who do their damndest to claim their not liberal, but that are truly liberal in every sense of the imagination.

You sort of acknowledge this, but...the problem with the "the media isn't liberal because the media is controlled by the private sector," argument, is that the liberals in POWER are just as interested in money than any conservative or republican power figure.

I think that they are ALL interested in money, regardless of political leanings.

But sometimes, who can blame them. It was probably why they got into the business to begin with.

God your ignorant. Everyone of your posts is just so full of pompus bullshit. I don't know how you come up with some of the shit you do, other then listen to the likes of Rush all day.

*stops wasting time reading your posts*