This is about a year old but I had not seen it before and found it interesting.

http://counterterror.typepad.com/the_co ... with_.html

Interview with Pierre Rehov, documentary filmmaker, on psychology behind suicide bombings
On July 15, I appeared on MSNBC's "Connected" program to discuss the 7/7 London attacks (you can see video of the segment on the linked page). One of my fellow guests was Pierre Rehov, a French filmmaker who has filmed six documentaries on the intifada by going undercover in the Palestinian areas. Pierre's upcoming film, "Suicide Killers," is based on interviews that he conducted with the families of suicide bombers and would-be bombers in an attempt to find out why they do it. Pierre agreed to my request for a Q&A interview here about his work on the new film. Many thanks to Dean Draznin and Arlyn Riskind for helping to arrange this special interview.

What inspired you to produce “Suicide Killers,” your seventh film?

I started working with victims of suicide attacks to make a film on PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) when I became fascinated with the personalities of those who had committed those crimes, as they were described again and again by their victims. Especially the fact that suicide bombers are all smiling one second before they blow themselves up.

Why is this film especially important?

People don't understand the devastating culture behind this unbelievable phenomenon. My film is not politically correct because it addresses the real problem—showing the real face of Islam. It points the finger against a culture of hatred in which the uneducated are brainwashed to a level where their only solution in life becomes to kill themselves and kill others in the name of a God whose word, as transmitted by other men, has became their only certitude.

What insights did you gain from making this film? What do you know that other experts do not know?

I came to the conclusion that we are facing a neurosis at the level of an entire civilization. Most neuroses have in common a dramatic event, generally linked to an unacceptable sexual behavior. In this case, we are talking of kids living all their lives in pure frustration, with no opportunity to experience sex, love, tenderness or even understanding from the opposite sex. The separation between men and women in Islam is absolute. So is contempt toward women, who are totally dominated by men. This leads to a situation of pure anxiety, in which normal behavior is not possible. It is no coincidence that suicide killers are mostly young men dominated subconsciously by an overwhelming libido that they not only cannot satisfy but are afraid of, as if it is the work of the devil. Since Islam describes heaven as a place where everything on earth will finally be allowed, and promises 72 virgins to those frustrated kids, killing others and killing themselves to reach this redemption becomes their only solution.

What was it like to interview would-be suicide bombers, their families and survivors of suicide bombings?

It was a fascinating and a terrifying experience. You are dealing with seemingly normal people with very nice manners who have their own logic, which to a certain extent can make sense since they are so convinced that what they say is true. It is like dealing with pure craziness, like interviewing people in an asylum, since what they say, is for them, the absolute truth. I hear a mother saying "Thank God, my son is dead." Her son had became a shaheed, a martyr, which for her was a greater source of pride than if he had became an engineer, a doctor or a winner of the Nobel Prize. This system of values works completely backwards since their interpretation of Islam worships death much more than life. You are facing people whose only dream, only achievement is to fulfill what they believe to be their destiny, namely to be a shaheed or the family of a shaheed. They don't see the innocent being killed, they only see the impure that they have to destroy.

You say suicide bombers experience a moment of absolute power, beyond punishment. Is death the ultimate power?

Not death as an end, but death as a door open to the after life. They are seeking the reward that God has promised them. They work for God, the ultimate authority, above all human laws. They therefore experience this single delusional second of absolute power, where nothing bad can ever happen to them, since they become God's sword.

Is there a suicide bomber personality profile? Describe the psychopathology.

Generally kids between 15 and 25 bearing a lot of complexes, generally inferiority complexes. They must have been fed with religion. They usually have a lack of developed personality. Usually they are impressionable idealists. In the western world they would easily have become drug addicts, but not criminals. Interestingly, they are not criminals since they don't see good and evil the same way that we do. If they had been raised in an Occidental culture, they would have hated violence. But they constantly battle against their own death anxiety. The only solution to this deep-seated pathology is to be willing to die and be rewarded in the after life in Paradise.

Are suicide bombers principally motivated by religious conviction?

Yes, it is their only conviction. They don't act to gain a territory or to find freedom or even dignity. They only follow Allah, the supreme judge, and what He tells them to do.

Do all Muslims interpret jihad and martyrdom in the same way?

All Muslim believers believe that, ultimately, Islam will prevail on earth. They believe this is the only true religion and their is no room, in their mind, for interpretation. The main difference between moderate Muslims and extremists is that moderate Muslims don't think they will see the absolute victory of Islam during their life time, therefore they respect other beliefs. The extremists believe that the fulfillment of the Prophecy of Islam and ruling the entire world as described in the Koran, is for today. Each victory of Bin Laden convinces 20 million moderate Muslims to become extremists.

Describe the culture that manufactures suicide bombers.

Oppression, lack of freedom, brain washing, organized poverty, placing God in charge of daily life, total separation between men and women, forbidding sex, giving women no power whatsoever, and placing men in charge of family honor, which is mainly connected to their women's behavior.

What socio-economic forces support the perpetuation of suicide bombings?

Muslim charity is usually a cover for supporting terrorist organizations. But one has also to look at countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran, which are also supporting the same organizations through different networks. The ironic thing in the case of Palestinian suicide bombers is that most of the money comes through financial support from the Occidental world, donated to a culture that utterly hates and rejects the West (mainly symbolized by Israel).

Is there a financial support network for the families of the suicide bombers? If so, who is paying them and how does that affect the decision?

There used to be a financial incentive in the days of Saddam Hussein ($25,000 per family) and Yasser Arafat (smaller amounts), but these days are gone. It is a mistake to believe that these families would sacrifice their children for money. Although, the children themselves who are very attached to their families, might find in this financial support another reason to become suicide bombers. It is like buying a life insurance policy and then committing suicide.

Why are so many suicide bombers young men?

As discussed above, libido is paramount. Also ego, because this is a sure way to become a hero. The shaheeds are the cowboys or the firemen of Islam. Shaheed is a positively reinforced value in this culture. And what kid has never dreamed of becoming a cowboy or a fireman?

What role does the U.N. play in the terrorist equation?

The UN is in the hands of Arab countries and third world or ex-communists countries. Their hands are tied. The UN has condemned Israel more than any other country in the world, including the regime of Castro, Idi Amin or Kaddahfi. By behaving this way, the UN leaves a door open by not openly condemning terrorist organizations. In addition, through UNRWA, the UN is directly tied to terror organizations such as Hamas, representing 65 percent of their apparatus in the so-called Palestinian refugee camps. As a support to Arab countries, the UN has maintained Palestinians in camps with the hope to "return" into Israel for more than 50 years, therefore making it impossible to settle those populations, which still live in deplorable conditions. Four-hundred million dollars are spent every year, mainly financed by U.S. taxes, to support 23,000 employees of UNRWA, many of whom belong to terrorist organizations (see Congressman Eric Cantor on this subject, and in my film "Hostages of Hatred").

You say that a suicide bomber is a ‘stupid bomb and a smart bomb’ simultaneously. Explain what you mean.

Unlike an electronic device, a suicide killer has until the last second the capacity to change his mind. In reality, he is nothing but a platform representing interests which are not his, but he doesn't know it.

How can we put an end to the madness of suicide bombings and terrorism in general?

Stop being politically correct and stop believe that this culture is a victim of ours. Radical Islamism today is nothing but a new form of Nazism. Nobody was trying to justify or excuse Hitler in the 1930s. We had to defeat him in order to make peace one day with the German people.
Are these men traveling outside their native areas in large numbers? Based on your research, would you predict that we are beginning to see a new wave of suicide bombings outside the Middle East?

Every successful terror attack is considered a victory by the radical Islamists. Everywhere Islam is expands there is regional conflict. Right now, their are thousands of candidates for martyrdom lining up in training camps in Bosnia, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Inside Europe, hundreds of illegal mosques are preparing the next step of brain washing to lost young men who cannot find a satisfying identity in the Occidental world. Israel is much more prepared for this than the rest of the world will ever be. Yes, there will be more suicide killings in Europe and the U.S. Sadly, this is only the beginning.

This is just cynical and ridiculous. It's all about the "hatred" inherent in Islam and nothing about the socio-environmental factors at all (particularly regarding the Palestinians)... it's racist and dehumanizing. People like this will exploit the anti-Semitism argument until it is milked-dry. Blind-ignorance.

its not racist since religion is not race.

Great reply, dude.

This guy's beliefs are based on absurd assumptions, generalizations, and fear. Take a look at what he's saying, its entirely superficial.





Yeah, and so do a lot of Jews and Christians.



What? They grow up in region dominated by years of violence that comes from ALL angles. What is "seeing good and evil the same way that we do" supposed to mean, as if they aren't entitled to their own beliefs? Isn't that what the first Amendment gaurantees? Sounds pretty unAmerican to me.



Right, that's exactly what it is. And what is the book of Revelations saying with regards to Christianity?



I'll paypal you $100 if you can prove this is true.



This whole "women of Islam are so oppressed" angle is so played out at this point that it's annoying. Its like an excuse to bomb them. Aside from that, in reality it has very little truth. And what is "organized poverty" anyway?



I can't believe he's actually saying this.



You have got to be kidding me. This is the most ridiculous argument ever.

Yeah, this director is a platform representing interests which are not really his!



Again, this argument is looking at the wrong things to villify. In the process it is a total simplification of the situation. Comparing Arabs and Islam to Nazis is as silly as when they say the same things about Jews or the United States.

Please explain how that comparison is valid in any sort of way.

By ignoring the "socio-economic" factors you are ignoring 80% of the argument. I dare you to speak otherwise.

your continued attempts to draw this comparison are laughable. why don't you go ahead and present some examples as to Jews or Christians perpetuating violence against innocents in the name of their religion that even come close to whats been done by Radical Islamists.


i would assume he's primarily referring to the notion that intentionally killing innocents as a matter of military strategy is clearly evil. are you telling us they're entitled to these beliefs?


wow. just wow. nobody is using this as an excuse to bomb anyone. if we were we'd be bombing the fuck out of the entire region. can you present us some evidence as to your claim that women in many Islamic countries are not oppressed?


why not? there's a lot of evidence that funding for terrorist passes through organizations masking as charities. do you dispute this?


why is the argument ridiculous? is he really representing his own interests? i guess you then believe that by blowing himself up in the name of Allah he really will be sent to eternal paradise? your response confuses me. how is a suicide bomber truly representing his own interests?


it's really not silly or simplified at all, if you look at what it is they are fighting for. which is basically a return to the dark ages.

The way I see it, your problem is that you are putting the microscope of criticism under their society and their society alone. You can't offer the same to ours or our values or anyone else's.



You're telling me there are no Christians or Jews in Israel who work for "God, the ultimate authority above all human laws"? Your forgetting the entire reason behind the creation of Israel. Why couldn't we have just put all the Jews in Montana rather than in the Holy Land?



I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of the "good vs. evil" argument. Israel is justified in killing 300 or so civilians in Lebanon to kill the greater evil of Hezbollah. But killing is still killing. Believing that killing civilians is perfectly just (like the extreme elements of Islam), is the same thing as killing civillians (or even minimizing civilian casualties) as a means to an end - as Israel and the United States does. It is still 100% wrong. That moral philosophy has total relevance to the situation, it's in the Bible, it was reinforced in the Age of Enlightenment, Ghandi and Martin Luther King believed it.

Besides, I saw it as a pure generalization of Islam's values. Bringing that argument into the context of war or even everyday human affairs is to assume one's side is in the right, whether it is America's side or their enemies. You can't apply it as universal law. And implying "we see it differently - therefore we are better" is still ONLY seeing it different.



Depends on what your definition of "oppressed" means.



Yeah, obviously.



Yes likeatab, I do believe that suicide bombers go to Allah.



No shit, really?

For the last two years, I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, which has a HUGE population of muslims, palestinians, etc. And I can attest that you, likeatab, are talking like you have never really sat down and talked to these people. You only have the "common american" blanket assumptions of islam, their treatment of women, and have no idea of the diversity that is present in this IMMENSE area which is the middle east. Yes, there are some pretty horrific things that radical muslims do, I don't deny that. But don't try to envelope a whole religion, a whole people, into that narrow frame. There are some pretty fucked up things that happen in the US, too...can you say civil rights?

There is a movie on suicide bombers called "paradise now." It's in Blockbusters, and it attempts to show the motivation behind the acts. Very scary, moving, and eye-opening.

though i do agree that this sound cut a little too clear for such a complex situation... i don't think this guy could be that ignorant considering he went and did the interviews and saw it first hand... i'm not saying this guy has an agenda, but none of us ever talked to a suicide bomber so we can't really claim that guy is ignorant cause we read bbc world news...

also the reason the psychological profile is so superficial is because he's profiling a group of people: suicide bombers... the correlation between suicide bombers is probably just on that kind of level

there is also the fact that there is a lot of outside forces controlling these people which he touched upon... and the easiest way to control a group of people is to not educate them... so the less they know, the less they will question their beliefs the more they'll be manipulated, and maybe at that point they get educated into a point where there is not to much them but a generalized identity of a suicide bomber....

basically what i'm saying don't shoot a guy who's seen it first hand down in a second... say i disagree but i'd like to see your movie and find out where you're going with this

I meant to make it clear that I was just referring to likeatab's responses, not the author of the article. I apologize if I was unclear.

no i was referring to the responses too, we cool

From the interview, the director was making all sorts of over-generalizations of Islam. I think that the radical elements of that religion are a very serious problem and we should be holding them accountable. The alternatives offered to these people, I also think, have been oftentimes unacceptable so we have to be more reasonable in what we are asking of them.

The problem I have with this documentary (or at least judging by the interivew and description) is that it is the director's perspective and his only, as if he's simply telling us these people are evil. It's as bad and as counterproductive as anything Michael Moore could possibly come up with.

oh ye of little faith

garbage. i've worked with muslim people who i consider friends.

this guy may state some generalizations that are open to critical response. but i don't believe it to be racist, in response to g_v playing his ever favorite card.

i think a literal interpretation of Islam, and it's integration into the state, is a very frightening thing. actually i think a literal interpretation of most religions are a very frightening thing. Islam just seems the most fucked up of all of them to me.

there are certainly moderates within Islam who deplore the acts of the radicals, but they are a somewhat silent majority, if in fact they are a majority.

My grammar teacher during my time on Canada was a iranian guy, he is muslim and he was totally against suicide bombers, since suicide is one of the worst sins ever.

if our somewhat liberal society has a lot of sexual frustration, i imagine that Islam must be hell for teenagers and such.

i think the film director has been reading too much Freud...and superficially so.

while i am sure sexual frustration plays a part in the formation of their adult minds, i cannot see how their repressed libido would culminate into suicide bombing.

but then when western culture had its period of sexual repsression and intense religious fervor, we burned women at the stake for being "witches".

from the male perspective, when you dont get any for a while, you go off like a bomb.

at this point, 3/4 of the world is in danger next time i bust a nut

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/vie ... hp?t=47351

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/vie ... hp?t=47467

i'm thinking these two threads have a common denominator.