View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 19 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Go_State
 Post subject: AP out of the BCS formula
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:35 am 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:52 pm
Posts: 6822
Location: NY
Gender: Male
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=1951112

I understand the writers' disgust with the BCS, and not wanting to be associated with such a poorly designed concept. However, by making this move, doesn't the AP poll become completely irrelevant? I mean, who's going to give a rat's ass where they are ranked in it next year? Oh, and since when have sports writers' been filled with integrity? :)

_________________
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com

Top
 
Clubber
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
High Roller
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 13660
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
Hopefully this is a sign of things to come as far as the BCS goes. It's such a fucking mess. Just have a playoff already you idiots!

_________________
2006-7 NFL Champions!

RM Led Zeppelin Tourney Champ

Top
 
tsunami
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:50 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
This pretty much puts ESPN (ESPN Coaches Poll) in a monopoly position over the BCS.

If there was talk of corruption before (ESPN pundits pushing for Auburn's move up in the ranks no doubt at least in part motivated by their contract with the SEC), this is only the beginning.

When a media company has an unusual amount of pull in a rankings system, it can become less about wins and losses and more about ratings and advertising.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind

Top
 
Green Habit
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:19 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
Clubber wrote:
Hopefully this is a sign of things to come as far as the BCS goes. It's such a fucking mess. Just have a playoff already you idiots!
Top
 
dogbelly
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 1584
Location: Huntsville, Tx
Gender: Male
Clubber wrote:
Hopefully this is a sign of things to come as far as the BCS goes. It's such a fucking mess. Just have a playoff already you idiots!


I could not agree more, it is about time they recognized that the BCS is garbage.

_________________
I won't change direction, and I won't change my mind

Top
 
parchy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
Landry
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:50 am
Posts: 11842
I came up with this bracket the other day... I think it's what we need



USC (#1) vs. Florida State (#16)

Miami (#8 vs. Louisville (#9)

Georgia (#7) vs. Virginia Tech (#10)

Cal (#4) vs. Michigan (#13)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Tennessee (#12)

Utah (#6) vs. LSU (#11)

Texas (#5) vs. Iowa (#14)

Auburn (#2) vs. Boise State (#15)
Top
 
Clubber
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
High Roller
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 13660
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
8 teams would be good enough for me

_________________
2006-7 NFL Champions!

RM Led Zeppelin Tourney Champ

Top
 
parchy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
Landry
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:50 am
Posts: 11842
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8
Top
 
Peter Van Wieren
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me

I've always said 12. Mostly because I think the top ten teams should all have a shot, and I think the top four should have an advantage.
Top
 
Peter Van Wieren
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
tsunami wrote:
This pretty much puts ESPN (ESPN Coaches Poll) in a monopoly position over the BCS.

If there was talk of corruption before (ESPN pundits pushing for Auburn's move up in the ranks no doubt at least in part motivated by their contract with the SEC), this is only the beginning.

When a media company has an unusual amount of pull in a rankings system, it can become less about wins and losses and more about ratings and advertising.

ESPN doesn't have any say over the actual poll. And they only have one vote in the AP poll as well.

I really hope they don't fold the BCS and go backwards. If it folds and there is not something to take its place then it would be back to the old, even worse way of doing things.
Top
 
tsunami
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
davo15 wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me

I've always said 12. Mostly because I think the top ten teams should all have a shot, and I think the top four should have an advantage.


I like this idea as well.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind

Top
 
flavdave
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am
Posts: 10731
Location: The back of a Volkswagen
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Virginia Tech.
Top
 
Mitchell
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
flavdave wrote:
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Virginia Tech.
Top
 
Clubber
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
High Roller
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 13660
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
Mitchell613 wrote:
flavdave wrote:
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Virginia Tech.

_________________
2006-7 NFL Champions!

RM Led Zeppelin Tourney Champ

Top
 
Peter Van Wieren
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
Clubber wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
flavdave wrote:
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Louisville.
Top
 
flavdave
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am
Posts: 10731
Location: The back of a Volkswagen
davo15 wrote:
Clubber wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
flavdave wrote:
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Louisville.


See, even with a playoff a deserving team will be left out. Both Tech and Louisville could make great cases as to why they should be the 8th team in the hypothetical playoff devised here. But Miami? No way. 8)
Top
 
Peter Van Wieren
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
flavdave wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Clubber wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
flavdave wrote:
parchy wrote:
Clubber wrote:
8 teams would be good enough for me




USC (#1) vs. Miami (#8

Cal (#4) vs. Texas (#5)


Oklahoma (#3) vs. Utah (#6)

Auburn (#2) vs. Georgia (#7)



There's parch's hot 8


Replace Miami with Louisville.


See, even with a playoff a deserving team will be left out. Both Tech and Louisville could make great cases as to why they should be the 8th team in the hypothetical playoff devised here. But Miami? No way. 8)

that's why there needs to be 12 teams.
Top
 
Mitchell
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
take out georgia
Top
 
punkdavid
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
Phew. That ought to solve everything.

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.

Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 19 posts ] 

Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Wed Feb 11, 2026 10:09 am