Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:11 pm Posts: 39 Location: Finland
adamdude wrote:
ive seen it, but this is the best quality version of it i have seen. thanks
I was a bit afraid to post the link/thread, cause I haven't been active in the PJ community for a while and didn't know if this is still rare or not but I guess it's all good.
_________________ 2000: Stockholm 06/28, Roskilde 06/30 2006: Athens 09/30
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:54 am Posts: 2863 Location: Colorado
YessCode wrote:
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
From what I understand, it wasn't the band's decision, but Sony's. The band liked this version more than the one everyone has seen, and Eddie had specifically asked the guy to make this version. Sony wasn't going to let it happen though.
_________________
Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
I had a dream last night that a hamburger was eating ME!
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:47 am Posts: 27904 Location: Philadelphia Gender: Male
Scrub12 wrote:
YessCode wrote:
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
From what I understand, it wasn't the band's decision, but Sony's. The band liked this version more than the one everyone has seen, and Eddie had specifically asked the guy to make this version. Sony wasn't going to let it happen though.
Which I don't understand, because this version is nowhere near as disturbing as the one Sony released. Aside from the shot of the gun towards the end, this is pretty tame stuff, especially by 1992 MTV standards.
_________________ It's always the fallen ones who think they're always gonna save me.
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
From what I understand, it wasn't the band's decision, but Sony's. The band liked this version more than the one everyone has seen, and Eddie had specifically asked the guy to make this version. Sony wasn't going to let it happen though.
Which I don't understand, because this version is nowhere near as disturbing as the one Sony released. Aside from the shot of the gun towards the end, this is pretty tame stuff, especially by 1992 MTV standards.
Yeah, but the original featured the band a lot more and didn't turn it into the Ed Vedder solo video. And you know Ed's feelings on that.
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:47 am Posts: 27904 Location: Philadelphia Gender: Male
Wease wrote:
dirtyfrank0705 wrote:
Scrub12 wrote:
YessCode wrote:
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
From what I understand, it wasn't the band's decision, but Sony's. The band liked this version more than the one everyone has seen, and Eddie had specifically asked the guy to make this version. Sony wasn't going to let it happen though.
Which I don't understand, because this version is nowhere near as disturbing as the one Sony released. Aside from the shot of the gun towards the end, this is pretty tame stuff, especially by 1992 MTV standards.
Yeah, but the original featured the band a lot more and didn't turn it into the Ed Vedder solo video. And you know Ed's feelings on that.
You mean Ed is a publicity whore? I don't believe that for a second.
_________________ It's always the fallen ones who think they're always gonna save me.
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:54 am Posts: 2863 Location: Colorado
Wease wrote:
dirtyfrank0705 wrote:
Scrub12 wrote:
YessCode wrote:
I've seen this before. Apparently the director was hurt when they went with the video we all know instead of his. He kinda of alluded the band selling out to MTV and a more flashy video.
From what I understand, it wasn't the band's decision, but Sony's. The band liked this version more than the one everyone has seen, and Eddie had specifically asked the guy to make this version. Sony wasn't going to let it happen though.
Which I don't understand, because this version is nowhere near as disturbing as the one Sony released. Aside from the shot of the gun towards the end, this is pretty tame stuff, especially by 1992 MTV standards.
Yeah, but the original featured the band a lot more and didn't turn it into the Ed Vedder solo video. And you know Ed's feelings on that.
I think it had more to do with the band getting some no-name director to make the video, and Sony wanted someone who had done it before.
Atleast that's what I remember from Five Against One.
_________________
Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
I had a dream last night that a hamburger was eating ME!
i saw this on mtv2 awhile back. they showed both versions back to back and had the directors talk about em both. it was interesting.
_________________ GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Never saw it before though.
