U.S. troops should stay longer in Iraq: Talabani

Thu Nov 2, 2006 2:59 PM ET
By Crispian Balmer

PARIS (Reuters) - Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said on Thursday U.S. troops should remain in Iraq for up to three more years to give Iraqi authorities more time to build up their own security forces.

At the start of a week-long visit to France, Talabani rejected suggestions Iraq had descended into civil war and accused the media of focusing exclusively on negative stories.

However, he said "international terrorists" were still concentrating all their efforts in Iraq which meant the country needed outside help to defeat them.

"We need time. Not 20 years, but time. I personally can say that two to three years will be enough to build up our forces and say to our American friends 'Bye bye with thanks'," Talabani told a conference organized by the IFRI think-tank.

General George Casey, who commands the 140,000 U.S. troops still in Iraq, forecast last week that Iraqis would be able to handle most tasks within 12 to 18 months.

Public pressure is building in both the United States and Britain to bring back troops from Iraq.

U.S. President George W. Bush's Republicans face possible loss of control of Congress in November 7 elections, with dismay over his Iraq policy a critical factor in voter intentions.

However, Talabani gave an upbeat assessment of the situation in Iraq, saying life was relatively normal beyond Baghdad.

"There is no civil war. The media is focusing only on the negative side of Iraq. ... We need to give the real picture. It's not just car bombs. Visit Iraq from the north to the south. Never mind Baghdad," he told reporters.

DEATHS

Very few French journalists venture into Iraq nowadays after three French reporters were kidnapped between 2004-2005 and held for months before eventually being allowed home.

The Iraqi Interior Ministry said more than 40 civilians died each day last month as a result of the political violence and the New York Times this week quoted the U.S. military as saying Iraq was descending into chaos.


Talabani angrily shrugged off the suggestion. "The Pentagon can say what it likes," he said, cutting short the questioner.

Prior to the meeting, Talabani said he would ask France for help with the rebuilding effort.

"I will ask (French President Jacques Chirac) to continue his support and extend the relation both politically and for trade. I will ask him to help us train some Iraqi police forces for use against terrorism," the Iraqi leader said.

Chirac told Talabani during their talks that Paris believed "it was important to fix the prospect of a withdrawal" of the international force in Iraq, the French leader's spokesman Jerome Bonnafont told reporters.

Chirac opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 that toppled Saddam Hussein but France has since patched up relations with Washington and promised to help the Iraqi government.

Talabani, who criticized Chirac in 2003 for not joining forces with the United States, said it was time to move forward and suggested big contracts might be open for French firms.

"Your oil companies can come to Iraq ... Americans didn't interfere (in our oil) and don't have any right to interfere."

(Additional reporting by Elizabeth Pineau)


http://today.reuters.com/news/articlene ... rss&rpc=22

Makes sense.

American troops are probably the closest thing to Israelis they have for target practice.

I can absolutely understand why the Iraqi pres. would say this. And to me the timetables that are being mentioned in the media sound a bit like subtle negotiation ploys between our gov't and the nascent Iraqi gov't to me. Maybe the difference gets split and we end up there for two more years? I understand the Iraqi pres. viewpoint, but it certainly doesn't change my feelings that we have no business being there in the 1st place. It was a war of choice and we are stuck cleaning up the mess we made.

Yeah, that convinced me. Thanks.

Two and a half!