Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: hall of fame
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:09 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
congrats to Ryno and Boggs

Jim Rice should have made it


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: hall of fame
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:16 pm
Posts: 8820
Doug RR wrote:
congrats to Ryno and Boggs

Jim Rice should have made it



Pete Rose should have made it, and until they let him in, the whole thing is a big joke.

_________________
http://www.farmsanctuary.org

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight" - Albert Schweitzer


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: hall of fame
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:11 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
PJDoll wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
congrats to Ryno and Boggs

Jim Rice should have made it



Pete Rose should have made it, and until they let him in, the whole thing is a big joke.


I agree


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
pete rose is scum


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:16 pm
Posts: 8820
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


What the hell are you blathering about now?

_________________
http://www.farmsanctuary.org

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight" - Albert Schweitzer


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
PJDoll wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


What the hell are you blathering about now?


pete rose


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:12 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
bert blyleven should be in


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:15 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


i see your point.

but an argument can be made that a player doing drugs does not directly compromise the game. a manager betting on games can.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:18 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


i see your point.

but an argument can be made that a player doing drugs does not directly compromise the game. a manager betting on games can.


there ya go, he did it as a manager, not a player...trust me, I dont like the guy but IMO he deserves to be there


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


i see your point.

but an argument can be made that a player doing drugs does not directly compromise the game. a manager betting on games can.


there ya go, he did it as a manager, not a player...trust me, I dont like the guy but IMO he deserves to be there



that's cool.

i'm kind of on the fence on wether or not he should be there. i kind of enjoy playing "devil's advocate" in threads like this.


you think blyleven(sp?) should be in?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:22 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


i see your point.

but an argument can be made that a player doing drugs does not directly compromise the game. a manager betting on games can.


there ya go, he did it as a manager, not a player...trust me, I dont like the guy but IMO he deserves to be there



that's cool.

i'm kind of on the fence on wether or not he should be there. i kind of enjoy playing "devil's advocate" in threads like this.


you think blyleven(sp?) should be in?


not sure about Bert...at least his nickname should be "be home blyleven"


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
High Roller
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 13660
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
Jim Morris should be in. Pete Rose should be in. Barry Bonds should get hit by a truck and have all his steroid juice spill onto the ground

_________________
2006-7 NFL Champions!

RM Led Zeppelin Tourney Champ


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Clubber wrote:
Jim Morris should be in. Pete Rose should be in. Barry Bonds should get hit by a truck and have all his steroid juice spill onto the ground



haha

morris and his 3.9 career era? would be the highest among all hall of famers.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Mitchell613 wrote:
pete rose is scum


doesnt take away from on field talent



i agree. 4,000 hits.

i dont want to go too far into this, but rose compromised his legitimacy by commiting the acts he is banned for


I hear ya, it's a pain to argue...If drug addicts can get in so can people who lay down bets


i see your point.

but an argument can be made that a player doing drugs does not directly compromise the game. a manager betting on games can.


there ya go, he did it as a manager, not a player...trust me, I dont like the guy but IMO he deserves to be there



that's cool.

i'm kind of on the fence on wether or not he should be there. i kind of enjoy playing "devil's advocate" in threads like this.


you think blyleven(sp?) should be in?


not sure about Bert...at least his nickname should be "be home blyleven"



didn't berman come up with that?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
High Roller
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 13660
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
Did i say Jim Morris, of course i meant jack. 175 complete games, most wins in the 80's. Dominant playoff pitcher

_________________
2006-7 NFL Champions!

RM Led Zeppelin Tourney Champ


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am
Posts: 10731
Location: The back of a Volkswagen
Clubber wrote:
Jim Morris should be in. Pete Rose should be in. Barry Bonds should get hit by a truck and have all his steroid juice spill onto the ground


It would be a damn shame if Bonds can get in but not Rose.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:30 pm 
Offline
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 9363
Location: Manhattan Beach California
Clubber wrote:
Did i say Jim Morris, of course i meant jack. 175 complete games, most wins in the 80's. Dominant playoff pitcher


As much as I loved to watch Jack pitch, I dont think he has the numbers to do it...(given the numbers they vote with)


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Mon Nov 24, 2025 7:19 am