Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Same-Sex Question
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:18 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Port of Paducah
I am having a debate with a person about same-sex marriages. I see nothing wrong with it and he does.

Here's his line of reasoning:
---------------------------
A person wants to marry his Mom. She's a widow and too old to conceive . . . . (or) . . . . he's adopted and she's divorced.

Anything wrong with that?

I mean, "they truly love each other" and want it "recognized as such".
----------------------------

Any comments

_________________
"And I know we can't all stay here forever, so I want to write my words on the face of today...and then they'll paint it."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Man, The Myth
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:12 am
Posts: 1080
Location: boulder
What does that question have to do with same-sex marriage?

_________________
"my fading voice sings, of love..."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:18 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Port of Paducah
stonecrest wrote:
What does that question have to do with same-sex marriage?


I think he's trying to draw some sort of parallel.

_________________
"And I know we can't all stay here forever, so I want to write my words on the face of today...and then they'll paint it."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:26 pm
Posts: 7392
Location: 2000 Light Years From Home
A parallel between incest and 2 non-related consenting adults getting married?

He sounds like Rick Santorum (R-PA), who said homosexuality, incest, and bestiality were the same thing.

_________________
You didn't see me here: 10.14.00, 10.15.00, 4.5.03, 6.9.03, 9.28.04, 9.29.04, 9.15.05, 5.12.06, 5.25.06, 6.27.08, 5.15.10, 5.17.10, 9.3.11, 9.4.11

yieldgirl wrote:
I look a like slut trying to have my boobs all sticking out and shit


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
Sounds like your friend's got some issues he needs to work out. :)

Seriously though, my challenge to anyone who can present any logical argument against same-sex marriage that is not based in religion or sentimentality is still open.

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:37 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:51 pm
Posts: 14534
Location: Mesa,AZ
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?

_________________
John Adams wrote:
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Maleficent
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:17 pm
Posts: 13551
Location: is a jerk in wyoming
Gender: Female
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.

_________________
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
That's it. I'm going to Wyoming.
Alex wrote:
you are the human wyoming


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:41 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
malice wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.


:lol: awesome!

Anyway, the pro-hetero-marriage-only argument is a lame one at best.

Anyway you look at it, it is discrimination against homosexuals.

That is the problem with faith-based legislation.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:42 am 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?

how about a child?

that is, unless you can honestly say dogs have more mental capacity than children to decide whether they want a human being to fuck or marry them.

Now, the correct quote, if you like your own reasoning, should be "I personally think if marriage is recognized by the state then it should recognize unions between siblings, etc."

But that would make way too much sense.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:45 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
You know what else is funny about the "sacred sanctity of marriage" is the high divorce rate in this country.

Obviously us heterosexuals have clearly not mastered marriage.

Why should we monopolize it? :lol:

Let everyone have a shot at it.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:36 pm
Posts: 1528
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
That point is fucking stupid. They are both incest, even though one is adopted. Which is illegal. Tell him he's an idiot.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Maleficent
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:17 pm
Posts: 13551
Location: is a jerk in wyoming
Gender: Female
davo15 wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?

how about a child?

that is, unless you can honestly say dogs have more mental capacity than children to decide whether they want a human being to fuck or marry them.

Now, the correct quote, if you like your own reasoning, should be "I personally think if marriage is recognized by the state then it should recognize unions between siblings, etc."

But that would make way too much sense.


After I marry and divorce that guy's dog, I'm going to marry you, David.

_________________
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
That's it. I'm going to Wyoming.
Alex wrote:
you are the human wyoming


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
tsunami wrote:
malice wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.


:lol: awesome!

Anyway, the pro-hetero-marriage-only argument is a lame one at best.

Anyway you look at it, it is discrimination against homosexuals.

That is the problem with faith-based legislation.


so is stopping someone from having sex with animals is discrimination against those who are into beastiality, isnt it?

and please dont say its not natural, cause the argument can be said the same for a man loving a man

now a woman loving a woman is a different ball game, well, cause im a guy ;)

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:49 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
Peeps wrote:
tsunami wrote:
malice wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.


:lol: awesome!

Anyway, the pro-hetero-marriage-only argument is a lame one at best.

Anyway you look at it, it is discrimination against homosexuals.

That is the problem with faith-based legislation.


so is stopping someone from having sex with animals is discrimination against those who are into beastiality, isnt it?

and please dont say its not natural, cause the argument can be said the same for a man loving a man

now a woman loving a woman is a different ball game, well, cause im a guy ;)


Beastiality is a crime because the animals cannot consent.

The same goes for incest, rape, and pedophilia.

That will not change and should not.

But for consenting adults, the story is completely different.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:53 am 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
tsunami wrote:
Beastiality is a crime because the animals cannot consent.

The same goes for incest, rape, and pedophilia.

That will not change and should not.

But for consenting adults, the story is completely different.


well, im pretty sure a daughter who is 16 or 18 can consent to letting daddy ravage her if she so chooses, and so can a young boy, so there goes that theory right?

so as an example, a person who is severely mentally challenged should never have sex or be married, cause they are not in charge of their faculties to make that consent, correct?

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:55 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
Peeps wrote:
tsunami wrote:
Beastiality is a crime because the animals cannot consent.

The same goes for incest, rape, and pedophilia.

That will not change and should not.

But for consenting adults, the story is completely different.


well, im pretty sure a daughter who is 16 or 18 can consent to letting daddy ravage her if she so chooses, and so can a young boy, so there goes that theory right?

so as an example, a person who is severely mentally challenged should never have sex or be married, cause they are not in charge of their faculties to make that consent, correct?


I think the laws regarding consent are correct and true.

If we do not allow consenting adults to marry, based on their sexual orientation, that is definately discrimination.

Non-consenting adults (mentally handicapped, raped, coerced) and children under the age of 18 do not apply because they cannot legally consent.

It makes sense to me, and millions of others.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:56 am 
Offline
User avatar
King David The Wicked
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 7610
Peeps wrote:
tsunami wrote:
malice wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.


:lol: awesome!

Anyway, the pro-hetero-marriage-only argument is a lame one at best.

Anyway you look at it, it is discrimination against homosexuals.

That is the problem with faith-based legislation.


so is stopping someone from having sex with animals is discrimination against those who are into beastiality, isnt it?

and please dont say its not natural, cause the argument can be said the same for a man loving a man

now a woman loving a woman is a different ball game, well, cause im a guy ;)

no, legislation against bestiality is protecting animal rights, just as legislating against child molestation is protecting children, not "discriminating" against pedophiles.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
davo15 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
tsunami wrote:
malice wrote:
$üñ_Dë\/|L wrote:
I personally think if same-sex marriage is legal, it should be legal to marry your cousins or siblings or dog or whatever. After all, you love each other, right?


I'm going to marry your dog.


:lol: awesome!

Anyway, the pro-hetero-marriage-only argument is a lame one at best.

Anyway you look at it, it is discrimination against homosexuals.

That is the problem with faith-based legislation.


so is stopping someone from having sex with animals is discrimination against those who are into beastiality, isnt it?

and please dont say its not natural, cause the argument can be said the same for a man loving a man

now a woman loving a woman is a different ball game, well, cause im a guy ;)

no, legislation against bestiality is protecting animal rights, just as legislating against child molestation is protecting children, not "discriminating" against pedophiles.


*ding*

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
tsunami wrote:
I think the laws regarding consent are correct and true.

If we do not allow consenting adults to marry, based on their sexual orientation, that is definately discrimination.

Non-consenting adults (mentally handicapped, raped, coerced) and children under the age of 18 do not apply because they cannot legally consent.

It makes sense to me, and millions of others.



you should learn your laws, many states, age of consent is 16


and for the record, what a couple, whether man and man, woman and woman, or man and woman do sexually with each other, is their business, and noone elses

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
Peeps wrote:
tsunami wrote:
I think the laws regarding consent are correct and true.

If we do not allow consenting adults to marry, based on their sexual orientation, that is definately discrimination.

Non-consenting adults (mentally handicapped, raped, coerced) and children under the age of 18 do not apply because they cannot legally consent.

It makes sense to me, and millions of others.



you should learn your laws, many states, age of consent is 16


and for the record, what a couple, whether man and man, woman and woman, or man and woman do sexually with each other, is their business, and noone elses


16, fine, as long as that is the legal age of consent.

The whole thing depends on consent.

And you're right, consenting adults should be able to do as they please and should be able to marry (recieving all of the rights and privledges that come with that).

And call it marriage as well.

cool beans.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 9:07 am