Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:58 pm Posts: 1148 Location: Green Bay
I hope they stand pat...I prefer them to suck.
But they did have one of the worst offensive lines in the history of football, so if they do want to improve, I'd suggest starting there. When the Packers defense records 9 sacks against you, you know things are bad. Even Cletidus Hunt got a sack...that's damn pathetic.
_________________ When the last living thing Has died on account of us, How poetical it would be If Earth could say, In a voice floating up Perhaps From the floor Of the Grand Canyon, "It is done. People did not like it here.''
are those people supposed to be the superfans? yeesh
as everyone said, o-line. this is a team that, in this crummy division, quite possibly makes the playoffs with a decent offensive line.
/requisite bears fan post
*washes hands*
_________________ i was dreaming through the howzlife yawning car black when she told me "mad and meaningless as ever" and a song came on my radio like a cemetery rhyme for a million crying corpses in their tragedy of respectable existence
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
will mike williams be around at #4? im not sure of any olineman this year worthy of a top 5 pick, does anyone have any names or is this something they should address via free agency?
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
will mike williams be around at #4? im not sure of any olineman this year worthy of a top 5 pick, does anyone have any names or is this something they should address via free agency?
i would say williams would be around at 4, but im with everybody else and think they need o line too, if you dont want it at that pick they should trade down then, but that offense isnt going anywhere if they dont improve the o line.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:08 pm Posts: 1018 Location: Oshkosh, WI
energystar wrote:
I hope they stand pat...I prefer them to suck.
But they did have one of the worst offensive lines in the history of football, so if they do want to improve, I'd suggest starting there. When the Packers defense records 9 sacks against you, you know things are bad. Even Cletidus Hunt got a sack...that's damn pathetic.
I'd like them to stand pat too. I think you hit the nail on the head though. They have to improve their line. A decent receiver would help too.
Their defense isn't too bad so if I were them I'd focus most of my draft and free agency money on the offense.
_________________ Been to: 07/09/95...09/22/96...06/26/98...06/27/98...06/29/98...10/08/00...10/09/00...06/21/03...06/30/06
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:05 am Posts: 8045 Location: Arlington Heights, IL Gender: Male
If the o-line gets healty then they dont really need to worry about it. And as everyone else said definatly draft Williams or Edwards. But what they really need is a play-making/shut-down corner. Charles Tillman can't get the job done. It would really solidified an already very very good defense.
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:58 pm Posts: 1148 Location: Green Bay
Trading Urlacher probably wouldn't hurt. That guy is a tool.
_________________ When the last living thing Has died on account of us, How poetical it would be If Earth could say, In a voice floating up Perhaps From the floor Of the Grand Canyon, "It is done. People did not like it here.''
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:58 pm Posts: 1148 Location: Green Bay
Athletic Supporter wrote:
energystar wrote:
Trading Urlacher probably wouldn't hurt. That guy is a tool.
Perhaps trade him to Green Bay?
Despite how much Nick Barnett reminded me of Bernardo Harris this year...NO.
_________________ When the last living thing Has died on account of us, How poetical it would be If Earth could say, In a voice floating up Perhaps From the floor Of the Grand Canyon, "It is done. People did not like it here.''
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
I hate to break it you people, but they have to worry about an offensive coordinator before they start thinking about skilled position players to draft. If they bring Turner back, they definitely will draft a WR (probably Mike Williams). However, they still have bad memories of the whole David Terrell incident.
Don't be surprised to see them draft a right tackle or guard (to match up with Olin Kruetz).
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:08 pm Posts: 1018 Location: Oshkosh, WI
Too Big a Man Too Say wrote:
If the o-line gets healty then they dont really need to worry about it. And as everyone else said definatly draft Williams or Edwards. But what they really need is a play-making/shut-down corner. Charles Tillman can't get the job done. It would really solidified an already very very good defense.
Everybody needs a shutdown cornerback, but they're tough to find, especially with the new pass defense rules. Certainly with the Bears playing Moss, Walker, Driver, and R. Williams twice a year though they need some solid DBs.
_________________ Been to: 07/09/95...09/22/96...06/26/98...06/27/98...06/29/98...10/08/00...10/09/00...06/21/03...06/30/06
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:58 pm Posts: 1148 Location: Green Bay
barefeet222 wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
energystar wrote:
Trading Urlacher probably wouldn't hurt. That guy is a tool.
Perhaps trade him to Green Bay?
Yes the Packers please. I really like Urlacher. As a Packer fan it's tough to say I like a Bear, but he is just an awesome player.
Did you forget the ?
Seriously, I hope you did.
_________________ When the last living thing Has died on account of us, How poetical it would be If Earth could say, In a voice floating up Perhaps From the floor Of the Grand Canyon, "It is done. People did not like it here.''
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
?
