Post subject: Has Pearl Jam Become a Glorified Bar Band?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:32 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 pm Posts: 3875
Has Pearl jam become a glorified bar band? Please give me a minute to make some points.
1. The way they play a song or arrange a song does not really change from tour to tour. Everything off of Ten and Vs. still sound the same today as they did 15 years ago. These songs have never gone under a big re-working.
2. Tours never adopt the sound of the new album. In fact with Pearl Jam it works the other way round. New songs are sonically changed to fit with the previous tours live sound. Case in point the Binaural tour. Old songs were not updated to the Binaural sound.
3. They see to play more and more covers every tour.
4. When was the last time you came home from a Pearl Jam show and were amazed by a song arrangement.
I'll contrast this to the favorite whipping boy on this board, U2.
Songs go under huge changes each tour. On the Vertigo tour Original of the Species was played as piano driven song on some legs and a full band and string driven song on other legs. Running To Stand Still is a guitar song on the Achtung baby tour, then a piano ballad on the Vertigo tour.
You hear a bootleg and you can nearly always tell which tour it was from as songs are refreshed to match the tour's sound.
Arrangements that have amazed me include; Running to Stand Still as a piano ballad, Walk On does as an duet with just Bono and acoustic guitar.
Post subject: Re: Has Pearl Jam Become a Glorified Bar Band?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:40 pm
Got Some
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:45 pm Posts: 1274 Location: Baltimore
tyler wrote:
Has Pearl jam become a glorified bar band? Please give me a minute to make some points.
1. The way they play a song or arrange a song does not really change from tour to tour. Everything off of Ten and Vs. still sound the same today as they did 15 years ago. These songs have never gone under a big re-working.
2. Tours never adopt the sound of the new album. In fact with Pearl Jam it works the other way round. New songs are sonically changed to fit with the previous tours live sound. Case in point the Binaural tour. Old songs were not updated to the Binaural sound.
3. They see to play more and more covers every tour.
4. When was the last time you came home from a Pearl Jam show and were amazed by a song arrangement.
I'll contrast this to the favorite whipping boy on this board, U2.
Songs go under huge changes each tour. On the Vertigo tour Original of the Species was played as piano driven song on some legs and a full band and string driven song on other legs. Running To Stand Still is a guitar song on the Achtung baby tour, then a piano ballad on the Vertigo tour.
You hear a bootleg and you can nearly always tell which tour it was from as songs are refreshed to match the tour's sound.
Arrangements that have amazed me include; Running to Stand Still as a piano ballad, Walk On does as an duet with just Bono and acoustic guitar.
Food for thought anyways.
You've got a really good point, especially compared to U2 who do re-arrange their songs quite a bit from tour to tour.
What you don't get from a U2 tour though is a wide variety of songs from all their albums. They'll break out a couple rarities here and there, but they certainly don't compare to the sheer # of different songs PJ plays on a tour.
It would be cool to hear PJ re-arrange some of their classics, like what they did with Jeremy and Corduroy.
Post subject: Re: Has Pearl Jam Become a Glorified Bar Band?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:43 pm
Got Some
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:37 am Posts: 2465 Location: A dark place
tyler wrote:
Has Pearl jam become a glorified bar band? Please give me a minute to make some points.
1. The way they play a song or arrange a song does not really change from tour to tour. Everything off of Ten and Vs. still sound the same today as they did 15 years ago. These songs have never gone under a big re-working.
2. Tours never adopt the sound of the new album. In fact with Pearl Jam it works the other way round. New songs are sonically changed to fit with the previous tours live sound. Case in point the Binaural tour. Old songs were not updated to the Binaural sound.
3. They see to play more and more covers every tour.
4. When was the last time you came home from a Pearl Jam show and were amazed by a song arrangement.
I'll contrast this to the favorite whipping boy on this board, U2.
Songs go under huge changes each tour. On the Vertigo tour Original of the Species was played as piano driven song on some legs and a full band and string driven song on other legs. Running To Stand Still is a guitar song on the Achtung baby tour, then a piano ballad on the Vertigo tour.
You hear a bootleg and you can nearly always tell which tour it was from as songs are refreshed to match the tour's sound.
Arrangements that have amazed me include; Running to Stand Still as a piano ballad, Walk On does as an duet with just Bono and acoustic guitar.
Food for thought anyways.
Bottom line, I have been to 16 PJ shows and have only left two of them thinking they were average or worse. All of the above may be true, but they leave their blood and bones on the stage almost every night.
_________________ Do you like crappy amateur photography? Check out my photo blog here.
Post subject: Re: Has Pearl Jam Become a Glorified Bar Band?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:45 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 pm Posts: 3875
stevep522 wrote:
You've got a really good point, especially compared to U2 who do re-arrange their songs quite a bit from tour to tour.
What you don't get from a U2 tour though is a wide variety of songs from all their albums. They'll break out a couple rarities here and there, but they certainly don't compare to the sheer # of different songs PJ plays on a tour.
It would be cool to hear PJ re-arrange some of their classics, like what they did with Jeremy and Corduroy.
I'll keep going back to Pearl Jam shows because they are so good, and they pull out something rare every night. I'll have a great time every time I go, and get to party with some great people.
I just think though of the wasted opportunity after Binaural and not doing a Binaural sounding tour.
Post subject: Re: Has Pearl Jam Become a Glorified Bar Band?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:13 pm
Force of Nature
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:22 am Posts: 308 Location: Massachusetts
tyler wrote:
Has Pearl jam become a glorified bar band? Please give me a minute to make some points.
1. The way they play a song or arrange a song does not really change from tour to tour. Everything off of Ten and Vs. still sound the same today as they did 15 years ago. These songs have never gone under a big re-working.
2. Tours never adopt the sound of the new album. In fact with Pearl Jam it works the other way round. New songs are sonically changed to fit with the previous tours live sound. Case in point the Binaural tour. Old songs were not updated to the Binaural sound.
3. They see to play more and more covers every tour.
4. When was the last time you came home from a Pearl Jam show and were amazed by a song arrangement.
I'll contrast this to the favorite whipping boy on this board, U2.
Songs go under huge changes each tour. On the Vertigo tour Original of the Species was played as piano driven song on some legs and a full band and string driven song on other legs. Running To Stand Still is a guitar song on the Achtung baby tour, then a piano ballad on the Vertigo tour.
You hear a bootleg and you can nearly always tell which tour it was from as songs are refreshed to match the tour's sound.
Arrangements that have amazed me include; Running to Stand Still as a piano ballad, Walk On does as an duet with just Bono and acoustic guitar.
Food for thought anyways.
If you think Even Flow sounds the same now as the shows from the 91 and 92 era you are really hard of hearing.
Garden was rearranged in 2000 and again in 2006.
They played MUCH less covers in 2006 than in 2003.
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:37 pm Posts: 7376 Location: Vlaardingen, Netherlands Gender: Female
I agree with a lot but I think the differences are just more subtle. Listen carefully and you'll find them And there is one song I would not mind calling 'dance'. I think it's funny how so many people love the song while they keep saying they hate dance/techno music.
groetjes,
Mirella
_________________ 93 Rdm2x 96 D L2x Ber Gro Ams Par Zür 00 L2x D Gla Man Car Par Pin Pra Kat2x Sal Lju Ver Ber Ham Ros L 01 BSB2x Sea2x 06 D Arn Ant Bern Bol Ver Mil Tor Pis Pra Ber Vie Zag 07 L Düs Nij Wer 09 L Rdm Ber Man L 10 D Belf L Ber 12 Am2x EV:Am2x
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 5:23 pm Posts: 12793 Location: Tours, FR Gender: Male
Mirella wrote:
I agree with a lot but I think the differences are just more subtle. Listen carefully and you'll find them And there is one song I would not mind calling 'dance'. I think it's funny how so many people love the song while they keep saying they hate dance/techno music.
I'm curious there, what song are you talking about ?
_________________ There has never been a silence like this before
I agree with a lot but I think the differences are just more subtle. Listen carefully and you'll find them And there is one song I would not mind calling 'dance'. I think it's funny how so many people love the song while they keep saying they hate dance/techno music.
I'm curious there, what song are you talking about ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum