Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:34 pm Posts: 880 Location: QLD, Australia
The 2003 tour was a great one, but I agree, he's much better looking with long hair (and I'm a guy who NEVER judges other guys lol) He seems to perform a lot better too.. even tho he doesn't put the pressure into his voice like he used to, and the music's toned down a lot compared to the 1992 Pinkpop, or such shows..
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:00 pm Posts: 13226 Location: Adelaide, AUS
adamdude wrote:
spenno wrote:
adamdude wrote:
2000 american tour would have been better if eddie had no facial hair. ooh yeah
Is that why Europe 2000 was better?
But...then, by that logic, 2006 would've sucked too.
Bah!
well... yeah... but mebbe... the 06 tour would have been even better if he had a shave?
Well, 2006 was pretty unsurpassable for the most part.
But yeah, I hate the beard. Ed looks tons better clean shaven.
Man, does this thread ever question our collective sexuality or what.
And just to increase that uneasiness a notch, I think Ed looked his best on the 2000 Euro tour. Hair of medium length, no beard - rockin' out but ina mature, wordly way.
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:31 am Posts: 1732 Location: Canada Gender: Female
spenno wrote:
Well, 2006 was pretty unsurpassable for the most part.
But yeah, I hate the beard. Ed looks tons better clean shaven.
Man, does this thread ever question our collective sexuality or what.
And just to increase that uneasiness a notch, I think Ed looked his best on the 2000 Euro tour. Hair of medium length, no beard - rockin' out but ina mature, wordly way.
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:21 am Posts: 1909 Location: The Jungle
long hair short hair
AT LEAST HES NOT BLONDE ANYMORE hahahaha
he looked like a damn California surfer with the blonde locks...
wait, he is a damn cali surfer hahaha.
I dont think the hair makes /breaks Ed / the band...
but I will say... Ed looks better with long hair... then Stone and Mike did with long hair. BUT, Stone and Mike look better with short hair, then Ed did with short hair... So i guess they got the "look" right now?
_________________ I am the king of the Jungle, they call me Tigerman
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 4:48 pm Posts: 4320 Location: Philadelphia, PA
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
long hair short hair AT LEAST HES NOT BLONDE ANYMORE hahahaha
he looked like a damn California surfer with the blonde locks... wait, he is a damn cali surfer hahaha.
I dont think the hair makes /breaks Ed / the band... but I will say... Ed looks better with long hair... then Stone and Mike did with long hair. BUT, Stone and Mike look better with short hair, then Ed did with short hair... So i guess they got the "look" right now?
except for Ed's beard.
2005 Canadian tour: liked the tour, liked Ed's look
2006: even better tour, not crazy about Ed's Messiah after 40 days in the desert look
Post subject: Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 3:54 am
Interweb Celebrity
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am Posts: 46000 Location: Reasonville
I've decided to throw away all my 2003 boots and DVDs because of Ed's hair. Freaking ridiculous. I can't watch or listen to this stuff. He's like Bob Sagat or something.
_________________ No matter how dark the storm gets overhead They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge What about us when we're down here in it? We gotta watch our backs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum