Post subject: Bush abandons moral absolutism. Huh?
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:38 pm
Got Some
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am Posts: 1311 Location: Lexington
“The people of the Czech Republic don’t have to choose between being a friend of the United States or a friend with Russia,†Bush said in his stop at this former Soviet satellite. “You can be both. We don’t believe in a zero-sum world.â€
Post subject: Re: Bush abandons moral absolutism. Huh?
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:40 pm
Supersonic
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am Posts: 10694
deathbyflannel wrote:
“The people of the Czech Republic don’t have to choose between being a friend of the United States or a friend with Russia,†Bush said in his stop at this former Soviet satellite. “You can be both. We don’t believe in a zero-sum world.â€
Post subject: Re: Bush abandons moral absolutism. Huh?
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:25 pm
too drunk to moderate properly
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
LittleWing wrote:
Just a lil different... Unless of course, Russia is a bunch of terrorists.
They're just the kind of terrorists that we like!
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Nation States = no absolutism Wars against words = absolutism
You'd think it'd be the other way around.
Maybe. Terror groups tend to be short lived versus nation states, so it's probably smarter to be flexible with nations as their leadership and guiding principles can change over time. Terror groups exist mostly for a goal, like pushing Israel into the sea. If the goal is wrong and violent, then I don't see why there should be a flexible stance.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
I see no reason why a missile defense system wouldn't make sense, especially if we make an honest effort to talk with Russia and China to reduce stockpiles further. Rusty warheads aren't much good to anyone anyway, and I'm sure Russia would love some free money, even if they have to dismantle a couple nukes in the process.
I see no reason why a missile defense system wouldn't make sense, especially if we make an honest effort to talk with Russia and China to reduce stockpiles further. Rusty warheads aren't much good to anyone anyway, and I'm sure Russia would love some free money, even if they have to dismantle a couple nukes in the process.
thats not happening though. bush opted out of the anit- ballistic misslei treaty back in 2003 and hasnt made an honest effort to discuss concerns with russia as far as i can see. both the US and britian have plans to develop new smaller nukes too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum