Study Says All Stem Cell Lines Tainted

Mon Jan 24, 7:55 AM ET Top Stories - Los Angeles Times


By Karen Kaplan Times Staff Writer

All human embryonic stem cell lines approved for use in federally funded research are contaminated with a foreign molecule from mice that may make them risky for use in medical therapies, according to a study released Sunday.


• Latimes.com home page
• Subscribe to the Los Angeles Times


Related Links
• Current Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Contaminated - press release (Salk Institute)



Researchers at UC San Diego and the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla report that if the stem cells are transplanted into people, the cells could provoke an immune system attack that would wipe out their ability to deliver cures for diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and diabetes.


The finding is a setback to the Bush administration's controversial policy that provides federal funding only for research using embryonic stem cell lines that were created before August 2001. Evidence that all such lines are contaminated supports long-standing concerns among researchers that the lines eligible for federal money are insufficient to propel research forward.


The scientists who wrote the study say it could take at least a year or two — if it is possible at all — to find a way to salvage the stem cells by wiping them clean of the mouse molecules.


"We don't know, but I'm trying to be optimistic," said Fred H. Gage, a professor of genetics at the Salk Institute who co-wrote the paper in the current issue of Nature Medicine.


The researchers said the safest course was to create fresh batches of stem cells that were free of contamination from animal molecules — a process that could also take years.


The need to develop new, uncontaminated embryonic stem cell lines would bolster the influence of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, a $3-billion funding agency established by state voters in November to circumvent President Bush (news - web sites)'s restrictions.


"This is why Prop. 71 is so important," Susan Fisher, a UC San Francisco professor of cell and tissue biology, said of California's stem cell research measure. "We will be able to do this basic research to be able to really produce a strong foundation on which this work can continue."


The new state agency allows the creation of new stem cell lines and will fund about $300 million a year in embryonic stem cell research for the next decade — more than 10 times the yearly spending at the federal level. The initiative marks the largest state investment in basic scientific research, an area traditionally funded by the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites).


The stem cell lines allowed under Bush's policy came from embryos donated by couples who no longer needed them for in vitro fertilization. In his 2001 address, Bush said: "This allows us to explore the promise and potential of stem cell research without crossing a fundamental moral line."


From the start, however, researchers questioned the viability of the Bush-approved stem cell lines. The president said more than 60 such lines existed worldwide. About 20 lines proved usable, although concerns persisted about the techniques that had been used to create and keep them alive.


When the stem cells were first isolated, they were grown in petri dishes lined with cells from mice and bathed in blood serum from calves and other animals. The animal material was used to encourage the stem cells to multiply while preserving their unusual ability to mature into any kind of human cell.


This "pluripotency" is why embryonic stem cells have been so promising for both researchers and patients. For example, doctors could treat patients with juvenile diabetes by growing replacements for islet cells that fail to make insulin.


Researchers have suspected that exposing the stem cells to animal products could have contaminated them with viruses, proteins or other molecules that could be dangerous to people. Now they have evidence it did.


According to the study, human stem cells have incorporated a type of sialic acid that is common in many mammals but isn't produced by people.


Potential contamination of the lines was discussed by Gage in October when he spoke to a National Academy of Sciences (news - web sites) panel drawing up ethical guidelines for such research.


When the acid, Neu5Gc, enters the human body — typically by eating meat or drinking milk — antibodies rush to attack it.





Dr. Ajit Varki, a professor in UC San Diego's department of cellular and molecular medicine, questioned whether stem cells containing the acid would also be vulnerable to attack if transplanted into humans. He and his colleagues exposed the stem cells to human blood serum that contained Neu5Gc antibodies.

"It kills the cells," said Varki, one of the authors of the study. "It's reasonable to assume the same thing would happen inside people."

The most straightforward solution would be to start again with new stem cell lines.

"If none of these funding issues and legal issues and ethical and moral issues existed, then it would make sense to start over," Varki said.

But to develop new lines, scientists must destroy 5-day-old embryos. Some religious leaders, social conservatives and others oppose the practice, saying it is tantamount to murder.

Bush's research restrictions have come under sharp attack from high-profile figures including former First Lady Nancy Reagan and actors Christopher Reeve, who died in October, and Michael J. Fox. The issue took center stage in last year's presidential campaign, and although Bush won reelection, advocates scored a victory with the passage of California's Proposition 71.

Since then, lawmakers in several other states, including Wisconsin, New York and New Jersey, have announced major funding proposals in part to keep top researchers and scientists from going to California. Even before the influx of money from states, many leading researchers chose to forgo federal funding, instead getting private grants that allowed them to create new embryonic stem cell lines.

Fisher said the other strategy of cleansing existing stem cells of the mouse acid might solve the immediate problem. But there is still the possibility that there are other animal molecules that could alter the cells and make them unsuitable for human use.

"Many people have been very uncomfortable with the derivation of human cell lines using mouse [cells] and animal proteins," said Fisher, who was not involved with the research published Sunday. "This is like being able to put your finger on why you're paranoid."

Looks like we need some new lines to compete....oh wait, Bush doesn't like that.

Well it looks like the crazies have total victory on this front now.

--PunkDavid

Thank god there appears to be people with enough interest in this to continue research in lines with private funding for at least the near future.

I'm not buying this for one second; sounds like complete propaganda to me.

I haven't read the article, but it's coming from a pretty well-respected journal and is written by individuals at highly respected and reliable institutes. I can definitely see how it could appear as propaganda trying to get federal funding for new lines, but I won't discount it that easily due to the source.

Scientists in the pro-stem cell community have been saying this FOR YEARS. I love how it's JUST getting out officially now. It's not propaganda, it's completely true.
Basically, what Bush did was completely screw the whole research. Because even with the fraction of viable samples that they have, when they DO discover a cure, they can't impliment it because there aren't enough materials to go around.

The cells are taken from eggs that would have never become life. Sometimes, when women have to go through cancer treatments, or just don't plan to have children until later in life, they have a bunch of their eggs frozen. When they want kids, they thaw the eggs, and use what they need. The left over eggs can't be re-frozen, so they're destroyed. THIS IS WHERE THE STEM CELLS COME FROM. Not all, but most. It's such a waste.

This doesn't require abortion, or any such thing.

Fucking Xtian nutjobs. It's weird how suddenly it's only up to God whether it's okay to 'kill' an embryo. Only God has control over life.

Of course, until the Dr tells you that you're ovary's are shit and your hubby's sperm is taint. Then it's perfectly okay to turkey baste yourself with a litter full of kids you can't afford to feed. "No, that's not going against God. Gimmie some free pampers!!"