Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:48 pm Posts: 863 Gender: Male
I thought some of the other musicians/studio geeks around here might find this little excerpt interesting. Tape Op (issue #16) interviewed Tchad Blake while he was recording Binaural and he discussed a little bit of it...
Quote:
Well, on your current project you’ve been working with a hugely successful band [Pearl Jam] on an enormous record label [Epic/Sony], have you felt big expectations from them?
Just from the band. I just want to make a record that’s good for the band. So it’s really about my own expectations. And I can be pretty hard on myself. It’s a matter of working with new people in a new studio in a new town [Seattle] for a long period of time.
How long have you been at it?
I was here a month in September, it’s been 3 weeks this month [November], and it’s probably going to be 2 weeks in the new year. And I’m used to doing a record in 4 weeks, 5 maybe. Mixed, done. Usually in a situation when you have a concentrated time. And this is different - everybody in the band has other things going on. Important stuff, like benefits, and shows to do, or a record company to run. So it’s a little bit piecemeal. People coming in, one at a time, doing specific parts. They’re used to it, it’s easy for them. And it’s a new kind of music for me to be working on - which I really like. I’m getting to stretch a little bit here. But I’m also trying to bring some of my sensibilities to it. But hopefully not too much. So my concern is that I’m helping them make the record they want to make. I’m being careful about that. I’m talking with everybody. That’s a different role for me. It’s not quite as, “Let’s just throw things down.” It’s a little more considered. It involves re-doing things that someone doesn’t like a few days later. That sort of stuff.
Have you had any specific directives?
Oh no, they’re open for a lot of stuff.
Lots of experimentation?
Oh yeah, they’re ready to do another kind of record. And I think we’re getting there.
To use a metaphor, some producers’ style might be like a soup base, to which an artist adds his/her own ingredients. But some, like yours for instance, are a spicy jambalaya from the start. Is it possible that in some cases you run the risk of overwhelming the project with your recipe?
Maybe so, yeah. But I’m trying to make sure that doesn’t happen here. I don’t want to just come in and put my stamp on the record. I want it to be the band’s project where I just add a few spices to the stew. So like I said I think we’re getting there. But technically it’s difficult because I think I have a hard time doing both: producing and engineering. Although Matt Bayles, who’s engineering this, really is great. But I can’t help [doing some of the engineering], I’ve been at it for too long. Sometimes I get so caught up in the sounds, say the snare drum, that I miss a verse, how the lyrics went. It’s hard to split my focus. So the mix of this will be at the Sound Factory, and that’s where I think I’ll really be able to lighten up and fly a little bit. Because I’ll be in familiar surroundings and I won’t have to think about any of the technical aspects of the process.
Let’s talk a little about gear. So what’s your relationship with the analog and digital mediums, respectively?
I’ve heard both sound good, and both sound bad. And it depends on the budget. Most people I work with aren’t like Pearl Jam or Sheryl Crow. They’re on smaller budgets and it’s cheaper to do analogue, that’s changing I know. Maybe not if someone owns [their own] Pro Tools and as far as editing goes, I love cutting tape. I come from the day when that was the way you worked and I love it. So I guess analog takes precedence.
Are you tracking on tape with Pearl Jam?
Yup. But they’ve got the new Pro Tools system set up. There are about 2 songs where I’ve spread the drums out all over the place - a compressed track, a SansAmp track, a room track, and then all the separate [close mic] tracks. And I’m keeping that way for now. And that’s taken up a lot of tracks. But some other things, like percussion and vocals, will probably go to Pro Tools directly. And then I’ll find a track to dump it to on the 24-track later. We have both going. I save everything to Pro Tools.
Anything new and strange you’ve used in making this record?
Well, I love the new Moog pedals. I’ve got those. The phaser is actually very cool. It’s actually like a little filter box. I’ve always wanted a phaser that you could actually stop. You get a filtering that you, like, in the throe of its phase modulation you can just stop and keep in that place. Very cool.
And how have you been using that?
On guitar and there’s a couple of drum things I’m going to use it on. And probably a vocal or two. Oh and here’s something for your readers. I’ve had this for years, but I’ve only used it once or twice in 10 years where it stuck. It’s a Ludwig Phase 2 synthesizer, made in the ‘70s. It’s a big box with a pedal that switches on like a wah-wah. It’s got all these settings - one that’s called “vowel,” one that’s called “parallel, I don’t know what else. Anyway, Mike McCready has really taken to this box and he’s probably gotten the best sounds I’ve heard out of it. Ludwig for crying out loud. It’s really a low-fi, bad, bad box and it’s looming large on the project. [laughs]
_________________ Thank you America for your delicious puddings!
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:16 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:48 pm Posts: 3115 Location: Edinburgh/Lincoln, UK
That's an interesting article, i've always got the impression that PJ called in Tchad Blake with a sense of ambition, but kinda got cold feet towards the end. I wish they experimented a little more and gave Tchad more responsibility, the result would have been so interesting.
"I don’t want to just come in and put my stamp on the record. I want it to be the band’s project where I just add a few spices to the stew.." - i guess that's a fair analysis of how binaural did turn out. Maybe not as daring as it could have been, but Tchad's presence was definitely there.
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:12 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:25 am Posts: 3216 Location: Aussie Expat in Ireland Gender: Male
Yep. He was there. The worst sounding album PJ ever made. Hrmph.
_________________ PJ: 1 in 1995, 2 in 1998, 20 in 2003, 13 in 2006, 3 in 2007, 8 in 2008, 5 in 2009, 4 in 2010, 5 in 2012. EV: 8 in 2011, 1 in 2012. Brad: 1 in 1998, 1 in 2002. Shawn Smith: 1 in 2008
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:47 pm
Supersonic
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:07 pm Posts: 12393
Interesting to see how he felt during the whole thing. I posted a link to this a while back, but here's the portion of his Gearslutz interview that talked about it. The interview was earlier this year.
Being a huge Pearl Jam fan, would please share your (some) experiences with this band? What was unique about the recording process?
I have mixed feelings about that record. I think it's a good record but in hindsight I don't think I was a great choice for the band. We didn't see eye to eye on many things sonically and we all got a bit frustrated in the making of the music but we persevered and managed to make it work. Brendon O'brien came on board to mix and helped make sense of it all.
-
I also had a conversation with Matt Bayles via e-mail, and he said that he thought Tchad's original mixes of the changed songs were far superior to Brendan's, and that Brendan made his fairly quickly because he was in the middle of another project with a deadline. I guess Tchad wanted to really experiment with twisting the way the band approaches the songs, create something new, and they wanted to make a Pearl Jam record.
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Supersonic
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:07 pm Posts: 12393
Uneducation wrote:
randallanddarcy wrote:
Yep. He was there. The worst sounding album PJ ever made. Hrmph.
I agree. While I love the album and every song on it. The recording was too cold and ridged.
I think the recording was fantastic....mixing has such a tremendous impact on the songs, though (as Stone acknowledges below). All the Tchad mixed songs I love the sound on. All the Brendan mixes sound terrible.
Quote:
AskPearlJam: Gigglegirl says: Did Brendan O'Brien produce any tracks on Binaural?
Stone: Brendan didn't produce any tracks on the record but he mixed maybe 7 or 8 of them. Which has a pretty dramatic effect on how the songs sound.
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:02 pm
Stone's Bitch
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:53 am Posts: 1435 Location: in fashion, the soft drinks, expansion Gender: Male
"cold feet" is the best way to describe binaural. it's hard to realize in the midst of a career, but looking back on it they should have done what the great laurence tierney suggested in reservoir dogs: "Shit your pants, dive in and swim."
They should have gone all the way with it - if they did, it would have been the type of record that grew in esteem over the years, kind of like a "pinkerton" effect.
_________________ I like rhythmic things that butt up against each other in a cool kind of way.
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:59 pm
Master of Meh
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:00 pm Posts: 13226 Location: Adelaide, AUS
evenslow wrote:
"cold feet" is the best way to describe binaural. it's hard to realize in the midst of a career, but looking back on it they should have done what the great laurence tierney suggested in reservoir dogs: "Shit your pants, dive in and swim."
They should have gone all the way with it - if they did, it would have been the type of record that grew in esteem over the years, kind of like a "pinkerton" effect.
Definitely, Binaural is the great "if might've been..." album for me.
It could've been their best record but it ended up being much less.
Definitely, Binaural is the great "if might've been..." album for me.
It could've been their best record but it ended up being much less.
Agreed...as a studio album. I don't know about their best record, but it would have been far better without the Tchad Blake effect.
Tchad Blake's recording approach worked well for Sleight of Hand and Parting Ways, but it killed Rival and the other up-tempo songs (I can't imagine Insignificance getting the full-on Blake treatment....I would suspect that is one of the songs they went back and re-edited). Overall, it had a far more negative effect on the album than a positive one. It's too bad that Riot Act wasn't the victim and Binaural (although they'd have to change the name) was. That and knowing now what they left off of Binaural (Sad, Education) to pop up later on Lost Dogs is just a shame. But it is what it is....as long as they don't team up with Blake again, they'll be fine.
I was listening to the CD on my stereo the other day and it sounded really nice - it doesn't have the 'classic rock' feel that the earlier stuff does and the 'garage rock' of Riot Act or the 'don't want to ruffle any feathers or make this record sound in any way distinctive rock' of Avocado. Unfortunately it has a terrible name (WTF were they thinking), evacuation (just cos matt joined the band you didn't have to put a song by him on there), the obvious omissions (although I think that even the songs that were on there could have held up with a few changes and no evacuation) and bad tracklisting.
I think they should have thrown caution to the wind and not let Brendan remix - it would be really interesting to hear the original mixes - leak????
Parting Ways still sounds epic up loud and the typewriter still unsettles me when I have forgotten that the cd is still playing and the whole room starts typing...scary.
Post subject: Re: Tchad Blake interview on Binaural
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:52 pm
Global Moderator
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
I've listened to the unmixed insignificance. You can tell that it is different but I was not left with really strong opinons one way or the other as to which I prefered. I never sat down and did a side by side comparison though
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum