Red Mosquito • View topic - Bin Laden to send 'strong message': Al-Sahab

given2trade · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 3:22 pm

I'm posting this more out of humor than anything else.

Quote:

The media wing of al-Qaida says Osama bin Laden soon will issue a new message addressed to the Islamic world.

There is a media wing? When you attend al-qaida university, how do they decide which division you end up in? "Ok, let's see...Jim...you are going to become a suicide bomber...Alex...we are putting you in charge of the website."

Quote:

Al-Sahab posted a banner Sunday on a militant Web site known for carrying the terror network's messages. It said a "powerful speech to the Islamic nation," will be issued soon.

When I first read this - immediately I wondered: if this website had google adwords - what ads would they show on this page? That has got to be tough matching advertisers with visitors to the al queda website.

Quote:

The announcement comes after a message from Bin Laden on Friday marking the 60th anniversary of Israel's foundation in which he vowed to continue his struggle against the Jewish state.

Messages typically appear within 72 hours of being announced.

Nothing funny about this part.

given2trade · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 10:25 pm

That was some funny shit. My real friends were laughing hysterically. Fuck you guys.

I added a little bit to it. Jim: "Hey, I know HTML....and Java!"

McParadigm · **Joined:** Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:07 pm **Posts:** 12393

Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 12:45 am

McParadigm wrote:

Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends

You know you laughed. You know it.

McParadigm · **Joined:** Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:07 pm **Posts:** 12393

given2trade wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends

You know you laughed. You know it.

Did I say I didn't?

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 12:59 am

McParadigm wrote:

given2trade wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends

You know you laughed. You know it.

Did I say I didn't?

I'm putting that first bit about al queda university into my non existant standup routine. The google adword part didn't make my real life friends laugh as much though I could imagine the ads being for things like:

BUYIUDSONLINE.COM
KILLTHEINFEDELS.ORG
OBAMAFORPRESIDENT.COM :haha:

(we know hamas supports him, right?)

EllisEamos · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 1:21 am

i think you're trying to hard. :peace:

PJ10alive41 · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 3:18 am

EllisEamos wrote:

i think you're trying to hard. :peace:

simple schoolboy · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 3:37 am

given2trade wrote:

BUYIUDSONLINE.COM

I'm trying to figure out what Intra-Uterine Devices have to do with Islamic terrorism.

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 5:01 pm

EllisEamos wrote:

i think you're trying to hard. :peace:

It's TOO hard and it took me about 3 minutes to write that post. How can that be described as trying too hard?

IT WAS DAMN FUNNY!

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 5:02 pm

simple schoolboy wrote:

given2trade wrote:

BUYIUDSONLINE.COM

I'm trying to figure out what Intra-Uterine Devices have to do with Islamic terrorism.

woops, IEDS. haha

simple schoolboy · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 8:04 pm

Maybe my understanding is limited here, but I thought that initially, the Palestinian issue was secondary to US forces in Saudi Arabia and Arab governments not being sufficiently Islamic. Is talking up the Palestinian issue just an attempt to stay relevant, or was this actually important to Al Qaeda from day one? Additionally, the disparagement of Hezbollah, while understandable in the Shia vs. Sunni context is rather humorous. Al Qaeda has little to no activity in that area, and it would seem that Hezbollah is far more disposed to, and capable of 'assisting' the Palestinians.

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 8:35 pm

simple schoolboy wrote:

Maybe my understanding is limited here, but I thought that initially, the Palestinian issue was secondary to US forces in Saudi Arabia and Arab governments not being sufficiently Islamic. Is talking up the Palestinian issue just an attempt to stay relevant, or was this actually important to Al Qaeda from day one? Additionally, the disparagement of Hezbollah, while understandable in the Shia vs. Sunni context is rather humorous. Al Qaeda has little to no activity in that area, and it would seem that Hezbollah is far more disposed to, and capable of 'assisting' the Palestinians.

This thread is not for actual discussion. You are only allowed to post if you are praising my witty banter.

PJ10alive41 · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 10:51 pm

given2trade wrote:

This thread is not for actual discussion. You are only allowed to post if you are praising my witty banter.

You're slipping.

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 11:21 pm

PJ10alive41 wrote:

given2trade wrote:

This thread is not for actual discussion. You are only allowed to post if you are praising my witty banter.

You're slipping.

That means at one point you put me above zero...awesome!

:thumbsup:

EllisEamos · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 11:33 pm

i meant you were trying to hard to get praise.

so you'll get none here.

funny, but kinda "meh" especially with everything after your initial post...

given2trade · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

EllisEamos wrote:

i meant you were trying to hard to get praise.

so you'll get none here.

funny, but kinda "meh" especially with everything after your initial post...

you keep using "to" wrong. it's "too".

i can't take you seriously until you nail that.

Orpheus · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 1:32 am

That's exceedingly unfunny.

given2trade · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 1:33 am

Orpheus wrote:

That's exceedingly unfunny.

I didn't even have to read what you wrote...just seeing that you posted in the thread I knew what was coming :haha:

EllisEamos · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 1:37 am

given2trade wrote:

EllisEamos wrote:

i meant you were trying to hard to get praise.

so you'll get none here.

funny, but kinda "meh" especially with everything after your initial post...

you keep using "to" wrong. it's "too".

i can't take you seriously until you nail that.

that's to bad...

Bin Laden to send 'strong message': Al-Sahab

Who is online