Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:52 pm Posts: 1058 Location: Hong Kong
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this yet. I guess it shows the media has no spine and proves the Administration seems to get a free pass on everything.
Who is Jeff Gannon? Just another reporter who gets payola from the WH to promote the Administrations policies. How does he guy into the press corps under an assumed name? It is all very disturbing to me that this is not being discussed more and that there is not more outrage.
Rest of this is taken from another poster on another site.
Quote:
There are two highly satisfying things about this story. One is that it is part of the slow yet steady exposure of the Bush administration's calculated and wide-reaching attempts to manipulate the media (think Paid "Journalists" playing pundit). The other is that it is an online exclusive. Most of the investigative work was done by an army of volunteer bloggers organized through various anti-establishment blogs, especially at The Daily Kos.
Here's a brief summary of the show so far, for those who didn't want to make it all the way through the truthout piece:
1) During Bush's last press conference, a reporter identifying himself as "Jeff Gannon from Talon News" asked Bush a softball question about how he was planning to deal with Democrats who were "so divorced from reality" that they were willing to suggest that perhaps Bush's domestic agenda might be bad for the country's economy.
2) Surprised by the audacity of the bootlicking and the obscurity of both the reporter and his news organization, the good people of the blogosphere set themselves to find out who "Jeff Gannon" was and what "Talon News" might be.
3) A number of things eventually came to light:
* Talon News is a right-wing partisan site that was established a mere 4 days before "Jeff Gannon" made his first appearance in the WH briefing room. It does not carry advertising, does not pay its 'reporters', has virtually no readership, and does not have paid subscribers. Much of "Jeff Gannon's" "journalism" consists of cut-and-pasted White House press releases.
* Talon News is essentially a subsidiary of GOPUSA, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a right-wing partisan advocacy group.
* "Jeff Gannon" has no journalistic creditials apart from a two-day seminar run by a right-wing organization, and no experience working as a journalist. Yet, he has a WH press pass and gets regularly called on.
* "Jeff Gannon's" real name is J. D. Guckert.
* Along with JeffGannon.com, J.D. Guckert owns a few other domain names, including: Hotmilitarystud.com, Militaryescorts.com, and Militaryescortsm4m.com.
(Can't figure out why he would need those domain names? Americablog explains it all for you.)
* A picture is unearthed of what looks very much like "Jeff Gannon," sorry, J.D. Guckert, naked except for a watch and a pair of white briefs, posing his chin on his hand meditatively while giving the camera what can only be described as a come-hither look.
(For the most sensational coverage of this aspect of the story, with tighty whities pic, look no further than the New York Daily News' Bush Press Pal Quits Over Gay Prostie Link.)
* As the revelations mount and the glee intensifies, "Jeff Gannon" suddenly announces his retirement.
* The mainstream media FINALLY picks up the story.
Why is this news? Well, think about it. Here's a guy with no credentials, operating under an alias, who is admitted into the WH press pool and gets called on by both McClellan and Bush--neither of whom, of course, now admits to knowing who the man is or how he got in there--and gets called on while other legitimate reporters are passed over. He is, in other words, a plant. He's being paid "a stipend" by Talon News, which otherwise employs "volunteer reporters", to pretend to be a journalist in order to try to make McClellan and Bush look better on TV. He's...I mean he's not even a shill. He doesn't rise to that level. He needs a whole new name. The Kos people have found one for him: PropaGannon.
But for a guy with no credentials and no career history, "Jeff Gannon" became real busy real fast. He was tight with right-wing shoutmaster Sean Hannity, who relied on "Jeff Gannon's" "exclusives" for his "coverage" of "Rathergate." And he is also up to his neck in the Valerie Plame affair--you know, that incident where the right-wing media outed an undercover CIA agent in order to retaliate against her husband, who had blown the whistle on the forged documents Bush cited in his State of the Union speech. That's why there are now two Congressional representatives and one Senator trying to start a formal investigation of "Jeff Gannon" and his nefarious activities.
Oh, and, by the way, in addition to helping endanger the lives of undercover CIA agents, "Jeff Gannon's" outside interests may include running an 'escort service' for gay men who want a little hot military stud action. This while 'writing' 'stories' with titles like "Kerry Could Become First Gay Pres."
McClellan's story is that "Jeff Gannon," who was denied a Congressional press pass because THEIR screeners shrewdly determined that he wasn't a journalist, is admitted to the WH on a 'day pass' (which I guess has been renewed every day for 2 years) and that any online 'advocacy journalist' could do the same. So, according to Scott, I could appoint myself the White House Bureau Chief for CFC.com News and apply for a daily pass under the CougVandal name, and get into White House press briefings.
Watch this story, folks. And do not be satisfied with what you see on TV. There's more information out there at Kos, Salon.com, and the other blogs than is going to make it onto the evening news. There are still an awful lot of unanswered questions in this story...
Yeah, it's bad. We all know that. The finger should most definitely point back at the people responsible for paying him off though as well, from what I've heard on right wing radio down here in NC, the media didn't point any fingers at the government.
The people responsible for putting up the bribe are just as responsible for the people who accept them.
However, regardless of what this guy accepted to promote the bill, he whole heartedly supported the bill, and most likely would have said the same thing regardless as to whether he was paid or not paid.
I hardly see this as a case of Bush trying to "own" the media. Let's try and stay within the rhealms of reality here.
Nor do I see the big deal about Jeff Gannon and Talon News. As the one blogger said, anyone can do what he did. More importantly though, the mainstream press, which you seem to think Bush is trying to buy, doesn't give the slightest bit of credence whatsoever to this guy. You will never, ever, ever see any of the major networks, either cable or network, showing any of these guys questions. They will never focus on them. These networks will continue to high light negative and hard questions tossed to the president.
How do you think this should be handled? Should only liberals be allowed to ask Mr. Bush questions? Should all questions asked be screened by you?
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:17 pm Posts: 13551 Location: is a jerk in wyoming Gender: Female
Is this such a surprise considering during the election campaign there was the whole deal with "false news" show or clips or whatever they were about medicare?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/10/12/113949/43
Quote:
SINCLAIR LINKED TO BUSHCO with false Medicare news segments by zknower Tue Oct 12th, 2004 at 08:39:49 PST
Remember back in March when TV stations were accused of broadcasting propaganda for the Bush Admin by airing segments "designed to look like news" which were, in fact, prepackaged spots prasing the new Medicare bill? Turns out one of the major groups cited was SINCLAIR.
from Center for American Progress:
SINCLAIR AIRS FAKE NEWS BROADCASTS PRODUCED BY BUSH ADMINISTRATION: In March, it was discovered that the Bush Administration was producing "television news stories, written and paid for by the government, which have the appearance of legitimate news segments delivered by independent reporters," and distributing them to local newscasts as a way of promoting administration policies - including its ill-conceived Medicare prescription drug law. On the broadcasts, a public relations professional named Karen Ryan pretended to be a reporter. Among the stations which aired the administration propaganda as news: WPGH in Pittsburgh "the Sinclair Broadcasting station that fired much of its news staff in favor of feeds from a centralized newsroom in Baltimore." Given the controversy over the anti-Kerry film, you'd think that their efforts in shilling for the administration earlier this year would be getting more focus from the SCLM; but a recent Google search shows that no one is yet reminding folks of this connection.
CAP has lots more on Sinclair for your various talking points, but this story actually shows them connected with the Administration.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Um, you don't get called on at White House press conferences unless the President KNOWS WHO YOU ARE. There is no doubt whatsoever that the President himself, personally, George W. Bush, was complicit in this fraud.
--PunkDavid
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 pm Posts: 9617 Location: Medford, Oregon Gender: Male
punkdavid wrote:
Um, you don't get called on at White House press conferences unless the President KNOWS WHO YOU ARE. There is no doubt whatsoever that the President himself, personally, George W. Bush, was complicit in this fraud.
--PunkDavid
_________________ Deep below the dunes I roved Past the rows, past the rows Beside the acacias freshly in bloom I sent men to their doom
Ha! You honestly think Bush knows everybody that walks in and out of that room on a day to day basis? Maybe the regulars, but everyone? If that's the case, at least he's good remembering names and faces.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:52 pm Posts: 1727 Location: Earth Gender: Male
Thought this would fit here:
Schwarzenegger got $450K from Fox News Channel's parent
The man who was going to "terminate" the special interests is breaking records in raising money from special interests! Including nearly half a million dollars from Fox News Channel parent company News Corp USA. $26 million in 2004, and he's already vowed to raise $50 million for his special election ballot initiatives.
Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics: "It's masterful. One of the things Arnold Schwarzenegger has done very well is to declare everybody else's big donors as special interests and his as interested in good government."
Who does Schwarzenegger consider a special interest?? NURSES! Yes. He's going to "kick their butts."
And who's standing up to this? Robert Greenwald -- my boss, and the director of Outfoxed, Uncovered, etc. He just did a 60 second commercial gratis with the help of all volunteers to let real nurses have a voice. The California Nurses Association (that evil special interest) liked it so much they put $100K into an ad buy to run it throughout the state and on A&E's broadcast of their Arnold movie.
_________________ "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum." -Noam Chomsky
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 1918 Location: Ephrata
LittleWing wrote:
Ha! You honestly think Bush knows everybody that walks in and out of that room on a day to day basis? Maybe the regulars, but everyone? If that's the case, at least he's good remembering names and faces.
Umm yes, he actually makes it a point of pride to know everyone's name (or he gives them a nickname).
So yes, I think at the very least Bush was made aware that he should call on this fellow. Maybe he didn't know the whole story of him but at least that his questions were gonna be a gimme
_________________ no need for those it's all over your clothes it's all over your face it's all over your nose
so lets see, the white house has someone planted whos going to ask a question, he gets called on and asks, and its hissy fit time
the guy in iraq has someone ask a question cause he cant, and he gets an applause
so which is, is one side allowed to do so and not the other, or is it bad for both sides to do it, or should it be ok for both sides to do it, cause im getting confused here with the hipocracy
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 1918 Location: Ephrata
Peeps wrote:
so lets see, the white house has someone planted whos going to ask a question, he gets called on and asks, and its hissy fit time
the guy in iraq has someone ask a question cause he cant, and he gets an applause
so which is, is one side allowed to do so and not the other, or is it bad for both sides to do it, or should it be ok for both sides to do it, cause im getting confused here with the hipocracy
peeps what are you talking about? be more specific on the Iraq thing please
_________________ no need for those it's all over your clothes it's all over your face it's all over your nose
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 1918 Location: Ephrata
Peeps wrote:
gogol wrote:
peeps what are you talking about? be more specific on the Iraq thing please
the reporter who wanted to ask rumsey(?) a question, but they were only allowing soldiers to ask questions, so he asked a soldier to ask his question
Are you serious? Did you read the articles at all? This is way different. Bush and company, or at the very least the GOP, was using a fake reporter to ask questions to either deflect from real issues or to promote something McClellan wanted to talk about.
Come on peeps.....jesus
_________________ no need for those it's all over your clothes it's all over your face it's all over your nose
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
LittleWing wrote:
Ha! You honestly think Bush knows everybody that walks in and out of that room on a day to day basis? Maybe the regulars, but everyone? If that's the case, at least he's good remembering names and faces.
He doesn't know everyone in the room. And guess what, he doesn't call on everyone either, only those he knows. This is nothing new. No president is going to call on some random reporter at a press conference who might ask him a question that is in some way inappropriate. And considering the extent to which this administration attempts to control their media coverage, there is NO WAY that the president would ever call on a reporter that was not totally vetted beforehand.
As for McClellan, the press secretary, you can be goddamned sure that he personally knows every single person in the press room. Everyone.
--PunkDavid
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:52 pm Posts: 1727 Location: Earth Gender: Male
gogol wrote:
Peeps wrote:
gogol wrote:
peeps what are you talking about? be more specific on the Iraq thing please
the reporter who wanted to ask rumsey(?) a question, but they were only allowing soldiers to ask questions, so he asked a soldier to ask his question
Are you serious? Did you read the articles at all? This is way different. Bush and company, or at the very least the GOP, was using a fake reporter to ask questions to either deflect from real issues or to promote something McClellan wanted to talk about.
Come on peeps.....jesus
Yes, are you serious!? Please explain your comparison? Or was this another attempt at humor? I imagine your "playing devils advocate" act has become a little played. Now your just not reading the article, or skimming through sections and making your completely random question of supposive hipporisy and whatnot. Come on man. It's getting old.
_________________ "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum." -Noam Chomsky
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum