Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
I suppose this could be merged with the MLB thread if necessary, but I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.

We all know the Home Run Derby is pretty much a joke, but it's no big deal because it doesn't mean anything. It's just players having fun, and spectacors getting to see a bunch of dingers. But I've felt my desire to watch it waned throughout the last decade with steroids being on everyone's mind. Sure, it meant nothing, but it was still cool to see who could hit the most home runs. But it losts its appeal when it became clear that the home run hitters in the game were the biggest juicers. Sure it was fun in 1999 watching Mark McGwire hitting them in Fenway, but in hindsight it's like "who gives a fuck, he's a cheater".

But not only has my interest in the event been tarneshed, but a question needs to be asked. Is/was the home run derby bad for major league baseball? We all know that the allure of steroids was to improve your stats, but mainly, your power stats. Bonds started going heavy on the juice when he got jealous seeing Sosa and McGwire compete for the HR title in 1998. So by having the home run derby, are/were we contributing to the over glorification of the home run, and driving more players to take steroids?

I'm certain that the glorification of the home run is largely responsible for how widespread steroids became, but did the derby have anything to do with perpetuatig it? Maybe not, but maybe.

Thoughts please.

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:27 pm
Posts: 1237
Location: Chicago
steriods or no steriods, the derby sucks. unwatchable, especially with espn in the mix.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
Yeah, ESPN does a piss poor job with it.

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 3072
Location: C-Town
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm certain that the glorification of the home run is largely responsible for how widespread steroids became, but did the derby have anything to do with perpetuatig it? Maybe not, but maybe.

Thoughts please.


You sure it wasn't the quest for bags full of cash that was responsible for how widespread steroids became?

_________________
"They got their dirty maize-and-blue hands on it, they screwed it up."
--Chris Spielman on Ohio State-Michigan rivalry


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
Joesanity wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm certain that the glorification of the home run is largely responsible for how widespread steroids became, but did the derby have anything to do with perpetuatig it? Maybe not, but maybe.

Thoughts please.


You sure it wasn't the quest for bags full of cashwins that was responsible for how widespread steroids became?


im sure the owners and gms and coaches all knew, but it helped them out to get the wins and have that job security

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Devil's Advocate
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am
Posts: 18643
Location: Raleigh, NC
Gender: Male
The idea of HRD is great, the execution is absolutely horrible. When you have hard-core baseball fans who are completely disinterested in watching, you're doing something wrong. The damn thing went on almost 3 hours. You can play an entire NFL game in just over that. It was horribly long.

I guess you can correlate the HRD to the PED era, but until your post, I never really put the two together....especially when you consider Hamilton's performance last year.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
Electromatic wrote:
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.


browsing through the channels, i stopped and watched 6 pitches go by until anything was swung on.

perhaps making it mandatory to swing at every 3rd pitch max would speed things up, or maybe see who can hit the most HR's in x amount of time, and bring in pitching machine so everyone sees the same pitch?

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar
I <3 Yoga Pants
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:47 am
Posts: 10993
Location: Herpe Farm.
who won?

_________________
Kosmicjelli wrote:
Im gonna be quiet now.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:05 am
Posts: 1003
Location: somebody else's sky
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm certain that the glorification of the home run is largely responsible for how widespread steroids became, but did the derby have anything to do with perpetuatig it? Maybe not, but maybe.

Thoughts please.

Seeing as how at least half of those named as PED users have been pitchers, I wouldn't be so certain the HR was largely responsible. Like Andy Pettite explained, he used to recover from injury faster.

_________________
DXM RADIO


Last edited by therealnod on Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:05 am
Posts: 8045
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Gender: Male
As bad as it usually is, it was even worse last night because of that ESPN Trax which was awful. Way worse that Fox's hockey puck.

_________________
Always up for a trade
http://db.etree.org/TooBigaManTooSay/list


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am
Posts: 10731
Location: The back of a Volkswagen
I can't think of any other event they could replace the Derby with that would be a guaranteed sell-out during the All-Star break.

_________________
Terminally Chill


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm
Posts: 10620
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Why don't they have an ump calling strikes and limit the number of strikes you can take like they used to?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:04 am
Posts: 12383
Gender: Male
its terrible

_________________
RIP Mr. Dirty Frank


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:39 am 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
Peeps wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.


browsing through the channels, i stopped and watched 6 pitches go by until anything was swung on.

perhaps making it mandatory to swing at every 3rd pitch max would speed things up, or maybe see who can hit the most HR's in x amount of time, and bring in pitching machine so everyone sees the same pitch?



yeah, at one point, I think it was Howard that saw one Inside, Outside and Center before the coach kind of looked at him and said where, the next one was down the middle and he still watched it. Essentially this is glorified beer league softball. Guys that have 0 plate dicipline all of a sudden become super selective?

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:05 am
Posts: 1003
Location: somebody else's sky
Electromatic wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.


browsing through the channels, i stopped and watched 6 pitches go by until anything was swung on.

perhaps making it mandatory to swing at every 3rd pitch max would speed things up, or maybe see who can hit the most HR's in x amount of time, and bring in pitching machine so everyone sees the same pitch?



yeah, at one point, I think it was Howard that saw one Inside, Outside and Center before the coach kind of looked at him and said where, the next one was down the middle and he still watched it. Essentially this is glorified beer league softball. Guys that have 0 plate dicipline all of a sudden become super selective?

Ryan Howard usually has zero plate discipline?

_________________
DXM RADIO


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
therealnod wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.


browsing through the channels, i stopped and watched 6 pitches go by until anything was swung on.

perhaps making it mandatory to swing at every 3rd pitch max would speed things up, or maybe see who can hit the most HR's in x amount of time, and bring in pitching machine so everyone sees the same pitch?



yeah, at one point, I think it was Howard that saw one Inside, Outside and Center before the coach kind of looked at him and said where, the next one was down the middle and he still watched it. Essentially this is glorified beer league softball. Guys that have 0 plate dicipline all of a sudden become super selective?

Ryan Howard usually has zero plate discipline?

Have you seen his strikeout totals?

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:19 am
Posts: 2405
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Why don't they have an ump calling strikes and limit the number of strikes you can take like they used to?


I like this idea. It would be a good way to get real pitchers involved too. It's nice that guys bring their old high school coaches and whatnot, but I think a guy like Wakefield, who didn't get a sniff in the actual game, would have had fun lobbing balls across the plate.

_________________
Oh Chimpanzee That!
Monkey News


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:05 am
Posts: 1003
Location: somebody else's sky
pearljamfan80 wrote:
therealnod wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
If any of us were 11 it might be a bigger deal. It's maybe not as fun as it used to be. Part of it might be the fact that we don't like the players as much as we did when we were younger. Still a 458 ft HR is still a pretty awesome site. It's just fairly long and slow.

Also Interleague play takes a lot of the allure away from all of the AS Game events but I do tune in for a few hitters.

Seeing Joe Mauer was cool.

I just don't see why it lasted so long. 1 hour to 1.5 is a gracious plenty. 2 rounds is enough.

The game tonight will be too much pregame/hype/sell commercials...and not all that interesting.


browsing through the channels, i stopped and watched 6 pitches go by until anything was swung on.

perhaps making it mandatory to swing at every 3rd pitch max would speed things up, or maybe see who can hit the most HR's in x amount of time, and bring in pitching machine so everyone sees the same pitch?



yeah, at one point, I think it was Howard that saw one Inside, Outside and Center before the coach kind of looked at him and said where, the next one was down the middle and he still watched it. Essentially this is glorified beer league softball. Guys that have 0 plate dicipline all of a sudden become super selective?

Ryan Howard usually has zero plate discipline?

Have you seen his strikeout totals?

Have you seen his walk totals?

_________________
DXM RADIO


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Home Run Derby: Is it bad for baseball?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:02 pm
Posts: 3391
Location: At work, at my desk.
I think the Slam Dunk competition is even worse than the derby.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri Jan 23, 2026 3:20 pm