Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
Ensign9 wrote:
Plus it's Cruise and Spielberg. Hard to go wrong there.
I was going to say, NO, but having remembered how great Minority Report is, I can't bring myself to it. Spielberg and Cruise have had their share of shit films though, and I'm sure this will be horrible. Has anyone seen the original? One of the biggest copout endings ever. Its terrible.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
They've been shooting scenes for this in Athens, NY the past couple weeks and I live about 45 minutes away in Albany. This lady came in to Kinko's, where I work, last Saturday and ordered a crapload of vinyl banners, telling us it was for this movie. They all read "American Red Cross" on them. I'm assuming they were props of some sort.
So, if you see any Red Cross banners in the background when this movie comes out, I printed 'em.
I also had some guy come in yesterday and make like 2400 black-and-white copies for their trip to Virginia, where they're apparently going next for more shooting.
Yeah. I'm lame. But I think it's kinda cool.
_________________
vacatetheword wrote:
I'll let you in on a little secret. Sometimes we mis-spell stuff and just tell you Americans 'it's how we spell it here'
wow, a remake, who would've thought hollywood would do something like that
_________________ i was dreaming through the howzlife yawning car black when she told me "mad and meaningless as ever" and a song came on my radio like a cemetery rhyme for a million crying corpses in their tragedy of respectable existence
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 584 Location: upstate NY
Oh man, the original SCARED me. I made my mother sleep on the floor next to my bed until I went to sleep, when I was 10 after I watched that. She held my hand, from the floor. She said the next day, that her arm had gone numb.
Plus it's Cruise and Spielberg. Hard to go wrong there.
I'm always concerned that the trailers show the best of a film as a tease and get one's hopes up, only to be disappointed later. Nevertheless, in this case, I fail to see why War of the Worlds would need to be remade - it was perfectly find in its original form. They should just release the original film into theaters. F remakes of "classics" - Spielberg should find some people who can actually write ORIGINAL screen plays, or adapt something from novel to film that hasn't aready been done (Like The Book of Merlin by T.H. White). I probably won't go see it, but if it happens to show up on television some day while I'm flipping channels I might stop to take a look at it.
Plus it's Cruise and Spielberg. Hard to go wrong there.
I'm always concerned that the trailers show the best of a film as a tease and get one's hopes up, only to be disappointed later. Nevertheless, in this case, I fail to see why War of the Worlds would need to be remade - it was perfectly find in its original form. They should just release the original film into theaters. F remakes of "classics" - Spielberg should find some people who can actually write ORIGINAL screen plays, or adapt something from novel to film that hasn't aready been done (Like The Book of Merlin by T.H. White). I probably won't go see it, but if it happens to show up on television some day while I'm flipping channels I might stop to take a look at it.
c-
Look at the latest trailer. You might change your mind and want to see it.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:50 pm Posts: 3955 Location: Leaving Here
Cartman wrote:
Look at the latest trailer. You might change your mind and want to see it.
I checked out all the trailers actually. I loathe Tom Cruise and don't care for Spielburg's work (nor Ron Howard actually), so even though it is undoubtly going to be visually impressive, it will most likely not be enjoyable to me. I find it difficult to have any empathy for any of Cruise's characters because in most all of his films his simply playing the roll of an ass-hole, so to find him believeable as a "working class family man" is really a stretch for me.
The little girl, however, looks like she is giving a brilliantly done performance for a child her age, and I hope she gets some sort of award for her efforts. Speaking of which, I also find it difficult to watch children (or animals) in distress onscreen and do not find it entertaining (the Carol-Ann character from Poltergeist comes to mind,....and Boomer the dog from ndependence Day. Such distressed characters impact me too emotionally to be entertained by their distress).
I have a feeling that the original message from the original fillm relative to or place in the universe, unity, etc. is going to be lost, or manipulated to a "Spielburg" style agenda, which I find when he does it, simply in poor taste and redundant.
I'm going to save my money and go see Sin City instead. Frank Miller is incredible.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum