Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 am Posts: 13555 Location: In your PANTS! Gender: Female
Are you not intersted in the opinions of the users of the message board you moderate? Multiple people here have ideas and suggestion for how this board can be improved but you choose not to listen because you seemingly can't handle the idea of being criticised yet you expect (accept) people to contribute to the running costs of the board. Why lock a thread that involves a conversation about moderating decisions?
_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Cheer up. You're not depressed, you're just a big homo.
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 am Posts: 13555 Location: In your PANTS! Gender: Female
You could've edited the thread title as NSFW. You could've deleted the picture. You could've edited the post and made it a link only. You could've moved the thread immediately. You could've implemented a ban straight away. You did none of those things. You locked the thread and let it stand as it was for hours.
Then you finally deleted it and banned someone for their post. Weak and ineffectual.
Did you ban the people who intentionally quoted the post as well?
_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Cheer up. You're not depressed, you're just a big homo.
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:51 am Posts: 43609 Location: My city smells like Cheerios Gender: Male
uglyduckling wrote:
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
That thread ended with a post that gave clarification. Nothing left to say about the matter.
_________________ "No matter how hard you kill Jesus, he would always just come back and hit you twice as hard."
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
theres never been discussion amongst the peons in terms of bans. the only time there has been is if its personal attacks
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:51 am Posts: 43609 Location: My city smells like Cheerios Gender: Male
Beef wrote:
You could've edited the thread title as NSFW. You could've deleted the picture. You could've edited the post and made it a link only. You could've moved the thread immediately. You could've implemented a ban straight away. You did none of those things. You locked the thread and let it stand as it was for hours.
Then you finally deleted it and banned someone for their post. Weak and ineffectual.
Did you ban the people who intentionally quoted the post as well?
No. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
It wasn't deleted. As I said in the other thread, I locked the thread because it was a spinoff. Someone made mention of a cocksucking picture, so I looked at it and saw that it showed what shouldn't be shown.
No.
_________________ "No matter how hard you kill Jesus, he would always just come back and hit you twice as hard."
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am Posts: 91597 Location: Sector 7-G
Mecca wrote:
uglyduckling wrote:
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
That thread ended with a post that gave clarification. Nothing left to say about the matter.
What are we 5?
_________________ It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
theres never been discussion amongst the peons in terms of bans. the only time there has been is if its personal attacks
It's never okay to discuss the workings of the board unless you do it behind the scenes with mods that you feel you can actually converse with. Which isn't many.
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 am Posts: 13555 Location: In your PANTS! Gender: Female
Mecca wrote:
Beef wrote:
You could've edited the thread title as NSFW. You could've deleted the picture. You could've edited the post and made it a link only. You could've moved the thread immediately. You could've implemented a ban straight away. You did none of those things. You locked the thread and let it stand as it was for hours.
Then you finally deleted it and banned someone for their post. Weak and ineffectual.
Did you ban the people who intentionally quoted the post as well?
No. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
It wasn't deleted. As I said in the other thread, I locked the thread because it was a spinoff. Someone made mention of a cocksucking picture, so I looked at it and saw that it showed what shouldn't be shown.
No.
So where is the user warning? Why ban someone hours after the fact? If you can't be bothered moderating effectively, why fucking moderate at all?
_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Cheer up. You're not depressed, you're just a big homo.
I think she raises a valid point though. Why can't there be a discussion? Is user input welcome only if it's in PM form? Why can't there be a discussion about it?
theres never been discussion amongst the peons in terms of bans. the only time there has been is if its personal attacks
It's never okay to discuss the workings of the board unless you do it behind the scenes with mods that you feel you can actually converse with. Which isn't many.
maybe if people didnt attack said mods everytime a grain of sand got twisted in the clit theyd be more agreeable to discussion?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
