Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:38 am Posts: 504 Location: Poughkeepsie
I enjoyed the first book. I wasn't surprised when I heard they were turning it into a movie cause it certainly lends itself well to that medium. The trailer looks good. I know its only two minutes long but it looks faithful to the book so far.
_________________ Homer: Ohhhhhh. Bart, get my suicide axe.
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:42 pm Posts: 17495 Location: Surfside Beach, SC Gender: Male
Not the original I read but this shows it;
Quote:
It was subtly mentioned and then outright confirmed today that the "Hunger Games" Trilogy would be headed to the big screen as four separate movies. What Lionsgate failed to mention (or more specifically avoided answering) was where the fourth film would be coming from.
Obviously the initial tome is incapable of being split up -- so let's focus on "Catching Fire" and "Mockingjay" since there is enough meat in between those pages to fuel three additional movies. Or at least there can be since I'm guessing we'll be seeing a lot of new movie material from Suzanne Collins, who wrote both the books and the screenplay.
The third book focuses on The Districts uniting to take down The Capital & President Snow -- this is accomplished by Katniss becoming The Mockingjay, a symbol of rebellion and power. Once the action in this installment kicks up, there are few places to actually scissor the tome in two.
What, are ya just going to stop the action with Katniss buried a hundred fur coats? I don't think so. To me, it's much more likely that "Catching Fire" is where the split will happen since there is a very logical place to divide the fun: The Quarter Quell.
Warning, the link contains some spoilers if you haven't read the second book yet.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
broken iris wrote:
Enjoyed the first book way more than a dude my age should. Optimistic this could be good.
I'm right there with you, bro.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:42 pm Posts: 17495 Location: Surfside Beach, SC Gender: Male
Same here. I originally read the first one because my girlfriend and her son were reading it, and they wanted me to before the movie came out. Now I feel like I'm way more into the books than they are.
_________________ I remember thinking, "that's really gay". -- Cameronia
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am Posts: 91597 Location: Sector 7-G
Rebar wrote:
Same here. I originally read the first one because my girlfriend and her son were reading it, and they wanted me to before the movie came out. Now I feel like I'm way more into the books than they are.
Dork.
_________________ It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:04 pm Posts: 311 Gender: Male
Rebar wrote:
Not the original I read but this shows it;
Quote:
It was subtly mentioned and then outright confirmed today that the "Hunger Games" Trilogy would be headed to the big screen as four separate movies. What Lionsgate failed to mention (or more specifically avoided answering) was where the fourth film would be coming from.
Obviously the initial tome is incapable of being split up -- so let's focus on "Catching Fire" and "Mockingjay" since there is enough meat in between those pages to fuel three additional movies. Or at least there can be since I'm guessing we'll be seeing a lot of new movie material from Suzanne Collins, who wrote both the books and the screenplay.
The third book focuses on The Districts uniting to take down The Capital & President Snow -- this is accomplished by Katniss becoming The Mockingjay, a symbol of rebellion and power. Once the action in this installment kicks up, there are few places to actually scissor the tome in two.
What, are ya just going to stop the action with Katniss buried a hundred fur coats? I don't think so. To me, it's much more likely that "Catching Fire" is where the split will happen since there is a very logical place to divide the fun: The Quarter Quell.
Warning, the link contains some spoilers if you haven't read the second book yet.
To reiterate my above post, maybe they can make an ending this time since they have 4 movies.
The only thing I'd really like is a better framing of where the districts are. I can assume that they are numbered sequentially (i.e. 1 is beside 2, etc) and that 12 is in Appalachia (where most of the coal in the country is located) but then where is 13? The geography is a little odd to picture when no concrete picture other than general descriptions are given.
I'm 34 and like Rebar I've enjoyed the books more than I probably should have. Well, minus the "ending", holy crow that was bad. Steven King couldn't write a worse ending.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
