http://www.etherzone.com/2005/mako042505.shtml

REJECTION OF THE FEMININE
IS ROOTED IN THE OCCULT

By: Henry Makow

Someday our educators and politicians will be held accountable for turning impressionable girls into lesbians and ruining their lives. They teach a hate-filled Feminist dogma that heterosexuality is a "social construct," males are violent predators, and sex with a man is rape.

Millions of gullible girls are falling into a diabolical trap intended to make them pursue careers instead of families. As I have said, the purpose is to depopulate and destabilize society by destroying its fundamental building block, the family.

I am not a fan of Dennis Prager , a Zionist propagandist, but I credit him for an intelligent interview with a young women Anna Montrose who described how university and the media made her bisexual. It is based on an article in the McGill Daily in which she declared:

"It's hard to go through four years of a Humanities B.A. reading Foucault and Butler and watching 'The L Word' and keep your rigid heterosexuality intact. I don't know when it happened exactly, but it seems I no longer have the easy certainty of pinning my sexual desire to one gender and never the other."

(Michel Foucault is a major French "post-modern" philosopher; Judith Butler is a prominent "gender theorist" at UC Berkeley; and "The L-Word" is a popular TV drama about "glamorous" lesbians.)

Read her interview and you will see she thinks men and women are interchangeable and marriage is mostly for a tax deduction. She is manifestly unfit for the difficult challenge of marriage and motherhood. Unfortunately, she is becoming the rule rather than the exception.

Paradoxically, female rejection of the male plays out as a usurpation of the masculine role and abandonment of the feminine one.

LILITH, THE FIRST FEMINIST

Innocents like Anna Montrose are the victims of Feminism, which has roots in the occult Kabalistic and Gnostic tradition that displaces God and rejects marriage and family as impediments to free sex and occult control of society. (Kabala and Gnosticism are the basis of Freemasonry, in turn the basis of modern Liberalism, Communism, Socialism, Zionism and Feminism.)

According to this occult tradition, Lilith was Adam's first wife, the archetype feminist that every man marries and then divorces.

Lilith and Adam argued constantly because Lilith refused to be under him in the act of love. saying they were "equal." This is from "The Story of Lilith" which dates from the between the 8th and 10th Centuries A.D:

God "created a woman for Adam, from the earth, as He had created Adam himself, and called her Lilith. Adam and Lilith began to fight. She said, 'I will not lie below,' and he said, 'I will not lie beneath you, but only on top. For you are fit only to be in the bottom position, while I am to be in the superior one.'

Lilith responded, 'We are equal to each other inasmuch as we were both created from the earth.' But they would not listen to one another. When Lilith saw this, she pronounced the Ineffable Name and flew away into the air. Adam stood in prayer before his Creator: 'Sovereign of the universe!' he said, 'the woman you gave me has run away.'

Lilith's refusal to lie beneath Adam is tantamount to the earth refusing to receive a seed. There is nothing inferior or "unequal" about this, no matter what this text has Adam say. It is part of the yin-yang, the active-passive, masculine-feminine dance that is at the heart of nature.

Man serves God. Woman serves family. In this way both are useful and their lives have meaning.

But the Gnostic/Kabalistic tradition wishes to overthrow God and nature and substitute the rule of (some) men. The New World Order is the culmination of this satanic tradition.

That is why the Ten Commandments are carted out of courthouses and replaced with "human rights" which are not God given, but are defined and applied selectively.

That is why our young women are raised to be dysfunctional and useless; why young men are not taught to serve God (Truth, Love) and give women a noble purpose.

LOVE HAS TO BE EARNED

The occult roots of modern culture also explain the confusing mystical haze that surrounds romantic love. This stems from the notion that we are divine and can love the "God within" our mate. In reality, this is a form of idolatry. Most of us are closer to insects than to God.

I would replace the word "love"with two words: "trust and respect." This concept is more realistic and understandable. True love develops over a period of years based on trust and respect.

Naturally, we must begin by "earning" our own respect by living up to personal ideals and achieving our goals. This is the source of self-confidence and attraction.

Then a man must "earn" a woman's trust and respect through slow and patient courtship. For a woman, love is an act of self-surrender, which renders her vulnerable. Her happiness depends on her careful choice of husband.

The popular misconception that we are entitled to love is another aspect of our occulture, and is partly responsible for our arrested development. Instead of becoming more worthy, more useful, we seek the magical "someone" who will love us just as we are.

WHAT WE CALL LOVE

What we call love is usually sexual infatuation. Young women behave as if sex appeal is all they need, and young men tend to confirm this error. The movies show men going gaga over women who have very little to offer, other than being pretty and quirky.

That's good for ten minutes, what about the rest of life? In the past, women had practical skills as wives and mothers. They learned to cook and sew and make the home beautiful and inviting. They became cultured and mastered a musical instrument. They knew about child rearing.

But more important, they developed a mental attitude. They were going to join their lives with a man and become his helpmate. They were going to bear his children and project his spirit into the future. That's what a woman's love really means.

My wife who is Mexican still has something of the Old World. We met five years ago over the Internet. She sent me a link, which she said was a gift. When I opened it, I saw she had designed a great new web site for my book, A Long Way to go for Date .

Love at first web site, her gesture told me that she was prepared to be useful, to help me.

A woman helping a man! What a strange concept these days when an ancient satanic conspiracy nears culmination.

There is so much wrong with this piece of shit article that I don't even know where to begin, except to state that everything clearly wrong with it should be evident to anyone who's remotely sane.
Looking up this guy online, and the things he's written, show that he is clearly out of his mind. The amount of whackos that are crawling out of the woodwork these days is staggering. Hilarious though, how he ridicules one set of beliefs in the occult while ignoring his own ridiculous beliefs in what is also basically superstition and the occult. He's too busy fabricating and distorting the history of the nature of the family and sexuality, in order to fit these occult beliefs, to realize how moronic he sounds. Or maybe it's just that his head is too far up his ass.

WTF....

You guys should try the other articles on that site.

A woman resfusing to be on the bottom is like the earth refusing to take a seed?

What?

We're just supposed to take it?

And I must refuse your test, push me and I will resist, this piece of shit article pisses me the fuck off.

A few points:

1) The woman interviewed is bi-sexual, so she has NOT been put off men.

2) I agree that encouraging people to be career people is silly. Have they forgotton what life is for?

3) Regarding the family, personally I think that someone should not be forced into having one.

4) Regarding sexuality and gender, yes, hatred of a gender or a sexuality is bullshit.

Blame it



... on the Zionists!

okay.....crazy people man.....crazy people

That man needs urgent psychiatric help, I suggest shock treatment. I can't find one valid argument in his text.

That's what I'm talking about. I got my bitch pumpin' out my babies, mopping my floors, cooking my dinner, and running my propoganda mach ...

What's that, baby? I ... cuz ... I was gonna ...

Hang on guys, I gotta go clean the bathroom.

"The popular misconception that we are entitled to love is another aspect of our occulture"(...)

He must be a very unhappy man.

thank you for the laugh.

You know, it took me a while to figure out if that was a satircal website or if those were serious opinions. Unfortunately it's the latter.

Man, the ACLU really, really hates the Constitution. You bet!

I like these people. They're funny. I just wish they weren't so, unfocused. There's an article in there about why it's wrong to eat horsemeat.

I stopped reading here.

Is there any news or debate here? It seems like the ravings of a complete lunatic, that everyone on this board, of all political stripes, are going to simply mock.

Sounds like a lot of the threads in N&D.

Yeah, but usually we're roundly mocking something stated by a public figure or legitimate news organization. Mocking someone who should be institutionalized hardly seems sporting.

I think we should be allowed to mock someone that has a public forum for their articles. This is no different than Pat Sajak's blog IMO.

I didn't suggest we shouldn't. It's just a little boring, that's all.