Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Biggest All Star Snubs?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:08 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Morgantown, WV
Gender: Female
Umm I believe Morgan Ensberg takes the cake this year. By the way, who won the AL spot for the last roster addition? It was between Jeter, Matsui, Crawford, Posednik, and someone else. I know Roy Oswalt won for the NL. I think I voted for Posednik just b/c I'm pullin' for the White Sox, plus the guy leads the majors in SB's.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
my first question is....you dont actually like teh announcers for the sox do you?

Secondly, Jorge Cantu...no question is the biggest snub ever.....and im gonna say bonderman only because clement and colon dont really deserve it more than him.

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Camden Crew
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:43 am
Posts: 18418
Location: Anytown, USA
Gender: Male
i'll throw delgado into the mix

_________________
stip wrote:
In five years, when you get laid and grow up, you should go back and read some of these posts and if you've turned into a decent person you'll realize how much of an asshole you sound like right now


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
blalock


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Mitchell wrote:
blalock


if defense mattered hed be a no brainer

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
blalock


if defense mattered hed be a no brainer


defense does matter


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm
Posts: 10620
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Mitchell wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
blalock


if defense mattered hed be a no brainer


defense does matter


*See Ozzie Smith


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Mitchell wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
blalock


if defense mattered hed be a no brainer


defense does matter

you are never wrong are you?

Offense > Defense im sorry i didnt specify, if defense mattered AS MUCH AS OFFENSE

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:51 pm
Posts: 646
Location: The Swamps of Jersey
Code:
    Derek Jeter      Scott Podsednik
G       84                         74
AB     341                       282
R       69                         50
H       105                       83
2B     12                         14
3B     2                           0
HR     11                         0
RBI    37                         17
BB     41                         34
SO     57                         41
SB     10                         44
CS     4                           9
BA    .308                      .294
OBP  .393                      .369
SLG  .452                      .344
OPS  .844                      .739


So Jeter leads Podsednik in Runs, Hits, Triples, HRs, RBIs, BBs, BA, OBP, Slugging and OPS, and Podsednik's in........


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm
Posts: 10620
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
blalock


if defense mattered hed be a no brainer


defense does matter


*See Ozzie Smith


*shows Manny Ramirez

you can make points on both sides, but who are we kidding, they arent gonna take someone who is a defensive stud unless he has adequete offense...but a slugger with shitty defense is a no brainer apparently

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?



ya, over half a run in era isn't a big difference :roll:


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?

jesus guys, im sorry isnt a snub, a way of saying players who didnt make it that deserved it? my god, im saying if Colon and Clement made it Bonderman was SNUBBED because his stats are so comparible......

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?

jesus guys, im sorry isnt a snub, a way of saying players who didnt make it that deserved it? my god, im saying if Colon and Clement made it Bonderman was SNUBBED because his stats are so comparible......



half a run difference in era is not comparable!


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
Mitchell wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?



ya, over half a run in era isn't a big difference :roll:


http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/stats/playercompare?sort=137&cat=Pitching&pids%5B5763%5D=1&pids%5B7106%5D=1

k, il ellaborate more.....Pudge went for Det. instead of Bonderman....well i feel Bondermans statitstics compared to the field were bette rthan pudges compared to the field meaning i think Bonderman belongs in the all star game, hence he was snubbed

_________________
what


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 14671
Location: Baton Rouge
Gender: Male
well, should they have picked bonderman and only had 1 catcher on the roster?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm
Posts: 10620
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Pearl Jam Is Good wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
colon doesn't deserve it more than bonderman?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

both have 11 wins, colon has a 3.42 era and 1.14 whip

bonderman is at 3.99 and 1.24

clement is very comparable to bonderman at 3.85 and 1.26, with more Ks


those really arent dramatically different for colon and bonderman......do you know a site to check out run support and quality starts and stuff like that by any chance? MLB and ESPN doesnt have them from what i see.


If those numbers aren't that different, how is Bonderman a snub?

jesus guys, im sorry isnt a snub, a way of saying players who didnt make it that deserved it? my god, im saying if Colon and Clement made it Bonderman was SNUBBED because his stats are so comparible......


Yes -- and Bonderman didn't deserve to make it. There are roster limitations. If you're going to put Bonderman on the team, you're saying he's better than those that already made it. In this case, he's not. Therefore, he didn't deserve to make it and, hence, was not a snub. Just because he's the first Tiger with 10 wins before the break since Bill Gullickson doesn't mean he got snubbed.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:06 am
Posts: 4258
Location: RM
k instead of letting people have opinions, lets all see if we can gang up on Mitchell now

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/stats/playercompare?sort=22&cat=Batting&pids%5B5275%5D=1&pids%5B6332%5D=1&pids%5B6239%5D=1&pids%5B6871%5D=1

tell me why Blalock is a snub

_________________
what


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Thu Jan 08, 2026 4:32 am