Post subject: HP Expected to Announce Massive Layoffs
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:09 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:50 pm Posts: 3955 Location: Leaving Here
HP Expected to Announce Massive Layoffs
By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
July 15, 2005
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Hewlett-Packard Co. is widely expected to cut thousands of jobs next week as part of a long-expected restructuring that will attempt to bring the computer maker's costs in line with business and its rivals' numbers, according to industry analysts.
The exact timing and number of layoffs isn't known, though observers speculate layoffs could range between 5,000 and 25,000 positions. The huge company, whose offerings range from digital cameras and printers to computers and corporate consulting, has 150,000 workers worldwide.
Alexa Hanes, an HP spokeswoman, declined to comment Friday on "rumors and speculation." Some HP workers have taken to calling the upcoming news "the Big One," according to the San Jose Mercury News.
In a research report Thursday, Moors & Cabot analyst Cindy Shaw said a management reorganization could be announced as early as Monday — and could include as many as 25,000 job cuts. She also said the company might announce the expected retirement of Chief Financial Officer Bob Wayman.
--x--
!! OUCH !!
Silicon Valley's economy has yet to recover from the 2000 election and 2001 Sept. 11 attack impact on commerce/spending... this layoff, if the numbers are accurate, is huge, even if it closer to the 5,000 number.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 8066 Location: Las Vegas via Rockford (Roscoe), IL Gender: Female
Green Habit wrote:
Boise's second largest high-tech employer is HP.
*sigh*
Wow, that's sad. Even if they *only* lay off 5,000 people, that is still a lot.
_________________ Frank Kevin
At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me Cause it's so much easier to handle all my problems if I'm too far out to sea
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
good for the pockets of the shareholders
bad for souls of the shareholders
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
LittleWing wrote:
It's that easy right B?
Anyone that fires 25,000 and doesn't worry about their soul, ... I don't want to know them.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Carly Fiorina should be in jail. What is this, number 4 she has run into the ground? How many jobs did Lucent lose again? 30,000? And she did all for the stockholders.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:12 am Posts: 1080 Location: boulder
HP employs roughly 150,000 people around the world and 75,000 in the US. Yeah it sucks that they are cutting jobs but a hell of a lot more people would be without jobs if HP went under or didn't exist.
Everyone praises capitalism's push towards efficiency; this is its side effect. Do you want it or not?
_________________ "my fading voice sings, of love..."
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm Posts: 9282 Location: Atlanta Gender: Male
They could all move to Delhi and get jobs with Dell customer service
Basically HP's quality control sucks ass.
If "efficency" meant eliminating middle and upper middle management many of the companies in the US would be more profitable and there would be less bullshit attached to making business decisions.
How many vice presidents does a company really need?
Last edited by Electromatic on Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
stonecrest wrote:
HP employs roughly 150,000 people around the world and 75,000 in the US. Yeah it sucks that they are cutting jobs but a hell of a lot more people would be without jobs if HP went under or didn't exist.
Everyone praises capitalism's push towards efficiency; this is its side effect. Do you want it or not?
Bah! That's a boogey man argument! I bet this move isn't to keep HP from going under, it's to keep profits big for a small number of people.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:25 pm Posts: 3567 Location: Swingin from the Gallows Pole
These layoffs are in part due to the fact that HP decided to compete in the computer market against Dell. HP makes printers not computers. This is why the CEO got the boot earlier this year. HP failed to make a dent in the computer industry, this is the downside of that.
_________________ This space for sale by owner. Contact within.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Zutballs wrote:
These layoffs are in part due to the fact that HP decided to compete in the computer market against Dell. HP makes printers not computers. This is why the CEO got the boot earlier this year. HP failed to make a dent in the computer industry, this is the downside of that.
Yes.
Electromatic wrote:
If "efficency" meant eliminating middle and upper middle management many of the companies in the US would be more profitable and there would be less bullshit attached to making business decisions.
Yes.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
