Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Oregon Supreme Court overturns 2 sex-show laws
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:58 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=15861

SALEM, Ore. — The Oregon Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional yesterday a state law against conducting live sex shows and a local ordinance regulating conduct of nude dancers.

Both restrictions violate the Oregon Constitution's guarantees of free speech and free expression, the court said in a pair of 5-1 decisions.

The free-expression rulings continued the state court's modern pattern of broadly interpreting state constitutional rights as forbidding virtually all regulation of obscenity.

The court's decisions have given Oregon "one of the most protective approaches to the interests of freedom of expression" of any state, said Steven Green, a Willamette University constitutional law professor.

"It certainly keeps us on the edge so far as what is expressive activity," he said.

The state constitution, adopted in 1859, says, "No law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write or print freely on any subject whatever."

Justice Michael Gillette, who wrote the majority opinions, said it "appears to us to be beyond reasonable dispute that the protection extends to the kinds of expression that a majority of citizens in many communities would dislike — and even to physical acts, such as nude dancing or other explicit sexual conduct that have an expressive component."

One ruling involved the owner of a now-defunct Roseburg adult business featuring live sex performances in private rooms.

Charles Ciancanelli was convicted of the crime of promoting a live sex show after undercover police paid women to engage in sexual activities while the officers watched in the "performance rooms" at the business, called Angels.

The Supreme Court tossed out that conviction, although it did uphold Ciancanelli's conviction for promoting prostitution.

That ruling "appears to expand further Oregon's already expansive free-speech law," said Kevin Neely, spokesman for Attorney General Hardy Myers.

"We don't believe framers of the constitution intended to limit the Legislature's authority to regulate sexual conduct in public," Neely said. He said the decision even raised doubts "as to whether laws against indecency are constitutionally sound."

The high court's other ruling overturned an ordinance in the city of Nyssa that required performers to stay at least four feet away from patrons at nude-dancing clubs.

Owners of Miss Sally's Gentlemen's Club in the small Eastern Oregon town near the Idaho border were fined $185 each for violating the ordinance.

Religious conservatives, neighborhood groups and local officials have complained that state Supreme Court rulings have produced a thriving sex industry in Oregon.

The Nyssa ruling "seems to leave Oregon cities no room to adopt reasonable and fair regulations pertaining to adult establishments," said Christy Monson, legal counsel for the League of Oregon Cities.

"The court could have struck a fair balance between a dancer's right of expression and the community's right to regulate for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens," she said.

Carmel Bender, a Portland lawyer for an organization that helps former prostitutes, said she was "very disappointed" with the rulings.

Bender filed a brief in the nude-dancing case on behalf of the Portland-based Lola Green Baldwin Foundation for Recovery.

"It seemed like a good time to address inconsistencies in the laws," Bender said.

She argued that so-called lap dancing amounts to sexual conduct for money and appears to fit the definition of prostitution.

It would require a voter-passed constitutional amendment to revise the free-expression provisions. Voters have rejected such statewide ballot measures three times in the past 11 years. The most recent vote was in 2000, when a measure to allow zoning of sex shops was defeated.

The American Civil Liberties Union hailed the court rulings as maintaining freedom from official censorship.

"When people get to decide for themselves and for their families what they want to read, see and hear, that keeps the government out of those decisions," said David Fidanque, executive director of the Oregon arm of the ACLU.

At the same time, he said, the court's upholding of Ciancanelli's conviction for promoting prostitution shows "there are limits as to how far people can go under current Oregon law."

Ciancanelli objected to a lower court's conclusion that the performers in the two-female sex show committed prostitution.

The Supreme Court said that although some acts in sex shows might violate other laws, the overturned law that prohibited even presenting such shows was invalid as restraining free expression.

Both rulings reversed the Oregon Court of Appeals.

The lower court, also in split decisions, contended that bans on sexual performances should be allowed as "historical exceptions" to free-speech rights because there were restrictions on public nudity and sexual conduct when the constitution was adopted.

Supreme Court Justice Paul De Muniz dissented from both of yesterday's decisions.

De Muniz said he didn't believe that masturbation and sexual intercourse in a live public show "is a form of speech that the drafters of the Oregon Constitution sought to protect.

"I cannot conclude that legislative regulation of public sex acts must stop at the theater door," he said.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
Well, recorded sex acts have been legal for a long time, so why not live sex acts?

Oh, and Roseberg is nowhere near Idaho--though I can see some savvy entrepeneurs scoping out the Ontario market right now. :lol:


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 2:23 am 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 WWW  YIM  Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Medford, Oregon
Gender: Male
Anything having to do with Roseburg and sex is going to add up to :throwup: reeeeaal fast.

_________________
Deep below the dunes I roved
Past the rows, past the rows
Beside the acacias freshly in bloom
I sent men to their doom


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:33 am 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
Cool. I know how I'm going out.

I'm going to take my medicial marijuana, my prescribed overdose of morphine, and go to a live sex show and take it all in.

Does Oregon have laws against sex with animals, or no, like in Washington? Donkey shows, they're not just for Mexicans anymore. :thumbsup:

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:07 am 
Offline
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:45 am
Posts: 1836
Location: Up Yer Maw
punkdavid wrote:
Does Oregon have laws against sex with animals, or no, like in Washington?


I remember from the Enumclaw horror story and implied law about the size of the animal.

If the animal is larger that human involved it is legal but if the animal is smaller it is cruelty.

One main function of having laws is a social charter of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. Surely fucking animals is just plain not cool? Should change the law if we have any self respect.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri Jan 30, 2026 5:05 am