Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:34 am Posts: 12700 Location: ...a town in north Ontario...
I don't know how many of you would be interested, but there's a fairly regular group of people that posts in the Sports forum, so I thought we could do a player of the week thing (like song of the week in PJ Chat) and pick a player to discuss each week. If we pick the right players, there could be a whole lot of discussion. I guess... just post here if you're interested and we can kind of get an idea of whether it'll work or not. PM if you want to pick a player for the first week.
_________________ I think we relinquished enough... and it's still dark enough... and it goes on and on and on...
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:43 am Posts: 18418 Location: Anytown, USA Gender: Male
warehouse21sj wrote:
is it wrong to vote for an eagle everyweek? if not, count me in!
so what eagle would have got it after the dallas game?
_________________
stip wrote:
In five years, when you get laid and grow up, you should go back and read some of these posts and if you've turned into a decent person you'll realize how much of an asshole you sound like right now
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:25 pm Posts: 3567 Location: Swingin from the Gallows Pole
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
The QB from Northwestern then. Northwestern maybe the most underrated team in college football.
Anyway, Michael Robinson threw 4 td's in the first half. The second team was in the whole 2nd half and ran all over Illinois. What did you want PSU to do??
_________________ This space for sale by owner. Contact within.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Zutballs wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
The QB from Northwestern then. Northwestern maybe the most underrated team in college football.
Anyway, Michael Robinson threw 4 td's in the first half. The second team was in the whole 2nd half and ran all over Illinois. What did you want PSU to do??
He had a good half against a terrible team. It's the Andre Ware for Heisman argument though.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:25 pm Posts: 3567 Location: Swingin from the Gallows Pole
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
The QB from Northwestern then. Northwestern maybe the most underrated team in college football.
Anyway, Michael Robinson threw 4 td's in the first half. The second team was in the whole 2nd half and ran all over Illinois. What did you want PSU to do??
He had a good half against a terrible team. It's the Andre Ware for Heisman argument though.
meh...
_________________ This space for sale by owner. Contact within.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Zutballs wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
The QB from Northwestern then. Northwestern maybe the most underrated team in college football.
Anyway, Michael Robinson threw 4 td's in the first half. The second team was in the whole 2nd half and ran all over Illinois. What did you want PSU to do??
He had a good half against a terrible team. It's the Andre Ware for Heisman argument though.
meh...
Hehe. I was trying to give you a hard time. Did anyone see Leinart's #'s against UW? Jesus.
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:26 am Posts: 7994 Location: Philadelphia
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
_________________ Something tells me that the first mousetrap wasn't designed to catch mice at all, but to protect little cheese "gems" from burglars.
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:27 pm Posts: 1547 Location: PA
jimmac24 wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
They didn't throw a pass in the second half because they were already winning 56-3. They most definitely ran the score up.
_________________ 2009 Red Mozi Fantasy Football Champion
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:26 am Posts: 7994 Location: Philadelphia
PJeff wrote:
jimmac24 wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
They didn't throw a pass in the second half because they were already winning 56-3. They most definitely ran the score up.
You are clueless.....did you see the game?
_________________ Something tells me that the first mousetrap wasn't designed to catch mice at all, but to protect little cheese "gems" from burglars.
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
They didn't throw a pass in the second half because they were already winning 56-3. They most definitely ran the score up.
what is a team supposed to do? kneel down for three plays and send out the defense every time?
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:27 pm Posts: 1547 Location: PA
jimmac24 wrote:
PJeff wrote:
jimmac24 wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
They didn't throw a pass in the second half because they were already winning 56-3. They most definitely ran the score up.
You are clueless.....did you see the game?
I watched the game and it wasn't pretty.
_________________ 2009 Red Mozi Fantasy Football Champion
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am Posts: 10731 Location: The back of a Volkswagen
PJeff wrote:
jimmac24 wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Zutballs wrote:
Michael Robinson - PSU
Done!!! Who's going to win it next week?
I think it should at least be in a competitive game, not running it up vs. a creampuff.
I just want to clarify that they didn't run it up. They had all of their starters out by the end of the second quarter and didn't throw a single pass in the second half. Probably the exact opposite of running it up.
They didn't throw a pass in the second half because they were already winning 56-3. They most definitely ran the score up.
That's not running the score up. You're supposed to do that in the first half.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:34 am Posts: 12700 Location: ...a town in north Ontario...
I just want to clarify... I didn't mean that we would talk about whoever was the best player for that week, we could just pick a player and talk about him. We could do teams instead... I don't know.
_________________ I think we relinquished enough... and it's still dark enough... and it goes on and on and on...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum