Hello warriors. I posted on Monday, and on Tuesday the file was absent the majority of the text of the post. I don't know what happened. I apologize for the delay. Finally got original file re-edited...
Next Tuesday evening the man we’ve elected as The President of our United States of America will be known. Unlike 2000, there will be no debacle of delay. The lawbreaking liberal activist judges in Florida won’t need to be spanked again by a majority of law-abiding Supremes. Angry Al Gore has been sent to Florida to, frankly, inflict more damage on a people and a place that have had enough. Like a hurricane’s nasty, fearmongering blowhardiness, Angry Al’s offensiveness is causing even 2000’s alleged disenfranchised to evacuate. Three or four hurricanes a year people are learning to handle. One visit every four years by the country’s sorest losing piss-ant is too much to put up with -- for any cause or even the mostly sunny weather and great beaches. The cold, harsh realities of losing everything really can knock the inspiration right out of a liberal's eggheaded ideological fantasy that Al Gore ever won anything. Floridians are tired of disasters -- including Al Gore, and especially one of continuing to hold up his perpetuated fraud -- bs from the very first recount. There will no Florida repeat. There will be no holdup with results. A little past most people’s decent bedtime on the evening of Nov. 2 we will know who will be occupying the White House for another four years.
Riots? Maybe. It’s up to the liberal loons and, at this moment, they are undecided. No, don’t be confused. I said the liberal loons are undecided, not that the “undecideds” are loons, even though of course they are...but we’ll leave that alone for right now. John Edward’s hawg-ish wife says, in between shopping for clothes at Bed & Bath stores, “there will be no riots if John Kerry and her husband win.” Remarkably, she, one of the elitist clique seeking keys to a couple of DC’s most prominent addresses, has stumbled into telling the truth: only liberals and democrats are kooks (and “scumbags” and “idiots” and “shove-it” artists) who riot. Win-or-lose -- her statement also frankly reveals -- Conservatives won’t riot because they have respect for themselves, our laws, and the property of others, and have reverence for decency and civility. It’d be a great time to be Sheriff in any too-many-rioting-liberals town and have the power to give the order: “Shoot to Kill. Don’t miss your mark.”
(Recently it was revealed -- you may not know, this is why I am telling you -- Liberals prefer Cream pies as the ammo we use to fight terrorism even though when throwing them their aim is not good. Ann Coulter says, using all the brawniness her healthy 99 pound physique can muster, Conservatives should start throwing punches. Most male Conservative colleagues with p/c media forums are outrageously attempting to talk her into calming down. My question: Am I the only Conservative male who agrees with her and thinks she shouldn’t be talked out of it?)
Ok, enough goofing around...
Every election year the the highly-paid election experts drag out the clichés. Their most creative one: This is the most important election of our lifetimes. They always posture it half as a question, half as an statement. Is it? -- It is.
I believe it is, and I believe it is even more. I believe it is the most important election of ALL lifetimes so far lived through this Republic of ours.
Try as mightily as political parties are, this election isn’t about the differing administrative policies each candidate intends to enact. It’s not the most important election of lifetimes because of how each will run our out of control monster government once elected. Frankly, elections of that nature are behind us, and we may never see their kind again. This election isn’t about how either candidate will use tax dollars or extend or retract tax cuts. It's not about terrorism or lost or found WMDs. It’s not about health care and tort reform. It’s not about Social Security or reversing Roe vs. Wade. It’s not about being patriotic or tolerating diversity. It’s not about putting God in or taking God out. No, it’s not about any of these. This election is about what existence is altogether. Whether or not we can even claim there is such a thing as reality at all. It’s about whether or not ideas and consequences are real or just imaginary. It’s about whether or not the words we use to define and communicate ideas are, indeed, what they distinctly are. It’s about whether or not words even mean nothing anymore. Because if they don’t, neither do the ideas. And when it comes to a hierarchy of ideas, least important to most important, policy ideas are at the very bottom.
Personally, I think we should teach a constant, ongoing civics lesson that all elections are most important -- because they really are and they are all the time. But teaching things that are important goes against long-term liberal modus-operandi. Stealthily, if you didn’t know, they are trying to evolve beyond the euphemism of liberalism and go by exactly what they are: marxists, communists, fascists. To do this takes time. It also takes making things important, unimportant. They’ve been at it quite a while and their efforts are paying off. To help them fulfill their goals, too many of your neighbors have already decided they don’t care about anything let alone voting: only approximately half of those who are of voting age, vote. When you see footage of a democrat (AKA COMMUNIST) rally and a lesion is shown shouting others down with “A dictator who gives me health care is a great dictator as far as I’m concerned. I like that dictator.” you know voting isn’t anywhere on their to-do list. Voting isn’t unimportant...it's vitally important. This fact doesn’t change just because of an abundance of individuals who don’t know or don’t care -- or because the NEA doesn’t want history or civics taught anymore.
A few days ago when I was thinking through some starting ideas of how to approach writing this post, I took a break and went to get the mail. I found an issue of the recent Rolling Stone magazine. No, I don’t subscribe to it. I don’t spend the time to read it, or junk like it. Somehow, years ago we got put on a mailing list where we are constantly bombarded to subscribe at reduced rates to magazines, so they send us various samples all the time. The issue I got has in it a pre-election interview with Kerry. It’s a long way from the road to our mailbox so on the walk back to my office, knowing the magazine was going to go in the trash, something prompted me to open the magazine and thumb through it, something I don’t typically do because I see it as wasting my time. Anyway, weirdly enough I turned right to the editorial page and my eyes went right to its opening paragraph.
Here are that editorial’s first three sentences: “Our current leadership seems to have lost its way and its moral compass. Dishonesty has become out national policy. We have been asked to debase our Constitution for political purposes, to enshrine bigotry and to take away fundamental rights from Americans.” A little further down in the article we have “But to simply list the dangerous failures of the Bush Presidency as the primary reason to vote for John Kerry would sell short a man of high purpose and moral courage.” (Recall in my Michael Moore post, I was bashed for not listing the lies of Moore. Here, liberals find that a list is a dismissible waste of time.) And there is more: “John Kerry brings gravity and experience to this historic race, not to mention an intellect equal to the challenges before the nation. A complex, modern world demands we make judgments based on facts and careful analysis, not ideology or religion.”
Fifty percent of the people in this country, give or take fractions of points, agree with the thoughts put forth in the Rolling Stone editorial. And as we have seen, these thoughts parallel the ideas expressed by the Democrat party and its political operation. Therefore, fifty-percent of the people in this country conceive lies as facts, cowardice as courage, and hypocrisy and dishonesty as moral. Fifty-percent of the people in this country consider having done nothing productive for 20 years as experience, taking all positions on every issue as high purpose, and intellect as making follow-the-leader choices and expecting others to buy that you are a decisive leader. Fifty-percent of the people in this country consider adhering to Constitutional principles as debasement of the Constitution, and protecting American interests as bigotry. Fifty-percent of the people in this country define opportunities as rights. Civilization is not in a good place. Our Republic is at a critical point in its existence. No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Do the math.
Political punditry likes to stir the pot, calling the ideological chasm between the parties, divisiveness. Like its something irrational, below adult behavior, and we should all try to rise above it. Like we can all still have our different ideas, but we “can all still get along.” I call it realization. The realization that 50% of the people in this country are ok with liars and lying and, obviously, want to live their own lives that way. Conversely, fifty-percent of the people in this country have had it up to their eyeballs and are waking up to the realization that they are fed up, tired of choking on the “relativism” shit they’re being fed and are just not going to take it anymore.
Politics is politics and it is a beast all its own and it always is going to be. I understand that. Politicos will always use spin to ameliorate or derogate information. But we are living in times where when even the truth and the lie are in the same room, the lie is accepted, argued for, and defended as if it the truth did not exist at all. There is knowing what is true and choosing to tell a lie, and there is using what you know and believe to be true and later finding out that it was incorrect. The latter is not lying, the former is.
To use former career jargon, I see this election as a blow-off match, one in a series of blow-off matches that will, with increasing intensity, take place over the next generation, maybe the next two generations. A blow off match in the wrestling business is a match that signifies the end to a long-running, back-and-forth, heated feud (called angle in the business) between opponents, each representing, to put it in the simplest terms, good vs. bad. During the feud, advantage goes back and forth. Which between good and bad seems to have the upper hand changes often enough that who the victor is, is not so sure. Of course, in the business, good always prevail. I happen to believe the same about life. Good is always chomping at the ass of bad to get out of the way. In our lives and the World we exist in there is always an abundance of what is good.
In real life terms, I believe an explosive culmination between the different philosophies/value systems people and government use to lead individual lives and address World issues has been reached. Both toleration and avoidance of truth have been pushed to their near absolute limits. There is little moral elasticity left to give evaders of reality and enablers of untruths the benefit of doubt anymore. To be utterly honest, it may not be, through this series of blow-off matches, that good prevails in the very end. But it is this most important election of ALL lifetimes, right now, that is launching all of us -- on both sides -- into a course of battle to settle the matter once and for all.
Truth is. America deserves better than either Presidential candidate. Neither George Bush or John Kerry are Presidential material. All of us who are thinking know this. All of us. We don’t have to go to too far back in this country’s history to find out that these two would have been shamed from the town’s public square if subjected to previous political times. Both are just that stupid or ignorant, bad, incompetent and spiritless. Such are the 21st choices we have, determined by the like-characteristics of today's cultural times, a decadent low now reached after 40-50 years of unfettered misbehavior, promiscuity and lack of consequence. Who can say, without spin and keeping a clear, guiltless conscience, either is truly, in the pure American sense, worthy of the power of any vote.
There’s a saying: “Failure to prepare is preparation to fail.” In the first debate Bush embodied it, in the other two it was too late to matter. Republican mouthpieces harp at us to not fail them -- give money, give time, make sacrifice -- yet spin how the President failed us. Four years as the Commander-in-Chief, constantly exposed to the preparation he needed in the debates to perform an absolute fait accompli, and he shows up prepared only to fail. Watching it was painful. Being in an 80-mile an hour car wreck would have been less so. The first debate could have been used to win the election -- then. Voting Nov. 2nd would have just been a formality. Whatever “winning” spin Bush got out of the debates, he got it from what Kerry lost; none of it did Bush earn himself. You let me down, Mr. President, and by doing so you put this country at risk. "Resolve" isn't part time.
I am told to vote my conscience. I intend to. Always have. For most Conservatives that means, though, to entertain voting for either the Libertarian party or the Constitution Party. That’s not what it means to me. The Libertarians are half anarchists and half dopers. And the Constitution Party has spun Christianity and The Founding of this Country into making it something that it most definitely is not. Cramming the ten commandments down throats when the commandments were simply an afterthought affirming human nature is offensive. There are many, many, living conservatives who believe in God and worship God a hell of alot more than the hypocritical organized religion followers. Any group that claims it is Constitutional but goes out of its way to reject Thomas Paine as a Level One Founding Father, or runs from mentioning Thomas Jefferson's own take on the bible, isn't Constitutional at all in my Conservative book. I say no. Voting for these fringe dwellers doesn't have anything to do with conscience, except that it is a complete lack of. Conscience isn't used to make quick fixes, it's about thinking long term. Long term is recognizing the fact that we have a two party system in this country. If we are going to recapture a traditional, constitutionally ground culture in this country it will have to happen through our Republican Party.
I will vote for George Bush. If you are a Conservative, this is a vote using your conscience. As John Kerry and other anti-American liberal loons like him are elected, we will keep compromisng, adulerating and leaving behind what America is and will likely get so far out from home, there will be no way to get back. Yes, it is unfortunate what we have to choose from. But -- if you choose one, we can buy some time, suspend absolute destruction. If you choose any other, you quicken the pace unto the day where choice will not exist at all.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:23 am Posts: 1041 Location: Anchorage, Alaska Gender: Male
62strat wrote:
[Civilization is not in a good place. Our Republic is at a critical point in its existence. No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Do the math.
Warrior
No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Huh.
[Civilization is not in a good place. Our Republic is at a critical point in its existence. No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Do the math.
Warrior
No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Huh.
haha, I didn't even make it that far to read that bit. That is hilarious.
I think Mr. Warrior has been hit over the head with one chair too many.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm Posts: 1965 Location: 55344
my question is: which incarnation of the ultimate warrior is this? there were at least a few different people who "played" the ultimate warrior over the years. the reason i always heard was that previous warriors died or were very messed up from steroid use.
i can just see a liberal professional wrestler becoming a huge villain in the wwe.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:31 pm Posts: 2423 Location: White Hart Lane Gender: Male
kusko_andy wrote:
62strat wrote:
[Civilization is not in a good place. Our Republic is at a critical point in its existence. No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Do the math.
Warrior
No civilization has survived far beyond the 200 year mark. Huh.
No, not at all, the Romans, the Byzantines, the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire & the Persians, they never lasted past 200.
You know as a political thinker, the Warrior makes a good wrestler...
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:37 pm Posts: 15767 Location: Vail, CO Gender: Male
ledbutter wrote:
my question is: which incarnation of the ultimate warrior is this? there were at least a few different people who "played" the ultimate warrior over the years. the reason i always heard was that previous warriors died or were very messed up from steroid use.
i can just see a liberal professional wrestler becoming a huge villain in the wwe.
there is only one apparantly....
read this, its from that same site...
Welcome to Warrior Web. The web presence of the man who Created, Owns and Performed the Ultimate Warrior. I am that man and my name is Warrior. This is my full legal name. Greater explanation about that lies herein.
A few things you should know to help you decide if you want to go any further.
First, the dispelling of a couple rumors. There was only one Ultimate Warrior. That is, in Sports Entertainment there was only one person who 'did' Ultimate Warrior -- that was me. There were not many different guys who 'did' him. No one else created his one-of-a-kind characteristics, donned his colorful gear, had the physique he did, ran speedily to the ring, shook the bejesus out of the ropes, threw violent, veiny-armed clotheslines or powered bodies up in Gorilla Press slams. I created him and I was the only one, EVER, who performed him.
Furthermore, I am not dead, nor have I ever died. Don't laugh. There are many kooks (too many) who write and tell me that I am or that I did -- and want me to write back and confirm it. Nor do I have a twin brother or look-a-like cousin who filled in for me when I was on death's bed with one fancy boot in the grave, as the rumors abundantly and frequently claimed I was. Again, let's get this straight before we move on to the next subject: I created Ultimate Warrior, I own Ultimate Warrior (as an Intellectual Property) and I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO EVER performed him. If you've believed otherwise, you've been duped. If you want to continue to believe otherwise now that you have the truth before you, you are stupidly choosing to remain ridiculously ignorant. And if you are, I can assure you none of the substantive thinking and enlightenment WarriorWeb provides will be of any interest to you.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:37 pm Posts: 15767 Location: Vail, CO Gender: Male
i have a feeling he is trying to state that he was theoriginal..the one who gave warrior the name and "ideals" and there were few imitators..but could never amount to what he brought to the warrior and what warrior stood for in the ring..etc...
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm Posts: 1965 Location: 55344
62strat wrote:
i have a feeling he is trying to state that he was theoriginal..the one who gave warrior the name and "ideals" and there were few imitators..but could never amount to what he brought to the warrior and what warrior stood for in the ring..etc...
i'm willing to live with that.
so...is political office in his future??? i can see him gorilla pressing a large desk.
i dunno, i'd like to debate his claims at their only being one man who was the ultimate warrior.
same as:
???
that looks like the same person to me
_________________ i was dreaming through the howzlife yawning car black when she told me "mad and meaningless as ever" and a song came on my radio like a cemetery rhyme for a million crying corpses in their tragedy of respectable existence
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
