Post subject: Re: The Knicks are an amazing franchise.
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:31 pm
Camden Crew
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 am Posts: 9057 Location: Camden, NJ
lowlight79 wrote:
Discuss. I am not a fan, but I need to hear the knick misery.
the Knicks of the 1990s caused me so much misery it makes me sick to think about it. Me and my buddies were about the biggest knicks fans you could find. and every summer we died a slow painfull death at the hands of Jordan, and 94 to houston. Those teams were almost like extended family to us. to this day if you bad mouth patrick ewing to me I go off like his middle name was Jebus.
now, the losing has gotten so bad for so long, we're all numb to it.
I just called my friend to see if he heard about the Rose trade, and all he could say was big fucking deal. how a NY team , especially one of the glamour franchises in sports, be so garbage is beyond me.
_________________ “You’re good kids, stay together. Trust each other and be good teammates to one another. I believe there is a championship in this room.”
-Ernie Accorsi in his final address to the NY Giants locker room before retiring as GM in January of 2007
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
Knicks are a disaster...but they don't come anywhere near the nonsense that has gone on with the Vikings. Not yet anyway...
_________________ “You’re good kids, stay together. Trust each other and be good teammates to one another. I believe there is a championship in this room.”
-Ernie Accorsi in his final address to the NY Giants locker room before retiring as GM in January of 2007
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 am Posts: 9057 Location: Camden, NJ
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:51 pm Posts: 14534 Location: Mesa,AZ
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
Better than the Arizona Cardinals history.
_________________
John Adams wrote:
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 am Posts: 9057 Location: Camden, NJ
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
2 finals apperances. a 60 win season, something like 13 straight years in the playoffs, sellouts every night for 11 years....Ill take that period over most teams any day. and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:22 am Posts: 1603 Location: Buffalo
Koufax wrote:
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
2 finals apperances. a 60 win season, something like 13 straight years in the playoffs, sellouts every night for 11 years....Ill take that period over most teams any day. and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
If Patrick doesn't finger roll, they might have in '94 too.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 am Posts: 9057 Location: Camden, NJ
vegman wrote:
Koufax wrote:
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
2 finals apperances. a 60 win season, something like 13 straight years in the playoffs, sellouts every night for 11 years....Ill take that period over most teams any day. and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
If Patrick doesn't finger roll, they might have in '94 too.
i think your thinking of the wrong yr. 94 was lost because John Starks went 2-18 and Riles let him stay in the whole game. If Hakeem doesnt get 1/10th of a fingertip on the ball starks short from 3 to end game six, they do win the 94 title
Patrick finger rolled in 95 vs Indy, but he started his move too far away form the basket to dunk it.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Koufax wrote:
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
2 finals apperances. a 60 win season, something like 13 straight years in the playoffs, sellouts every night for 11 years....Ill take that period over most teams any day. and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
I suppose you're right. For all the "parity" a salary cap is supposed to create... the last 26 years have had
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:22 am Posts: 1603 Location: Buffalo
Koufax wrote:
vegman wrote:
Koufax wrote:
edzeppe wrote:
Koufax wrote:
parchy wrote:
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
they may be a joke now, but only since the day the Dolans took over. the Checketts/Grunfeld Knicks of the 90's was the 2nd greatest era in knicks history
then the history isnt that good if the 2nd best era resulted in one finals appearance that was a loss.
2 finals apperances. a 60 win season, something like 13 straight years in the playoffs, sellouts every night for 11 years....Ill take that period over most teams any day. and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
If Patrick doesn't finger roll, they might have in '94 too.
i think your thinking of the wrong yr. 94 was lost because John Starks went 2-18 and Riles let him stay in the whole game. If Hakeem doesnt get 1/10th of a fingertip on the ball starks short from 3 to end game six, they do win the 94 title
Patrick finger rolled in 95 vs Indy, but he started his move too far away form the basket to dunk it.
Yup, my bad. I still think he could have dunked that ball, but whatever. I always liked Ewing anyway and thought he got kind of a raw deal. It seems like he always had teamates from The White Shadow or something.
The Knicks are probably the funniest franchise in sports
Knicks are a disaster...but they don't come anywhere near the nonsense that has gone on with the Vikings. Not yet anyway...
The Vikings aren't funny though.
the Love Boat and the Whizzinator wasn't funny?
_________________ “You’re good kids, stay together. Trust each other and be good teammates to one another. I believe there is a championship in this room.”
-Ernie Accorsi in his final address to the NY Giants locker room before retiring as GM in January of 2007
and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
f--k that. the Knicks could have beaten them that year if Charles Smith makes a damn layup (or if they call a foul on Pippen and Jordan). Add it to the long list of dissapointing Knick losses...
_________________ “You’re good kids, stay together. Trust each other and be good teammates to one another. I believe there is a championship in this room.”
-Ernie Accorsi in his final address to the NY Giants locker room before retiring as GM in January of 2007
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 am Posts: 9057 Location: Camden, NJ
Ricardo Tubbs wrote:
Koufax wrote:
and if MJ wasnt around the 1993 team would have won the title hands down.
f--k that. the Knicks could have beaten them that year if Charles Smith makes a damn layup (or if they call a foul on Pippen and Jordan). Add it to the long list of dissapointing Knick losses...
maybe its because Mr. Fluid is a hometown boy, but I have NEVER blamed him for that play. he got absolutely RAPED by Jordan and Pippen, I mean hammered on all four consecutive attempts. its hard to make a layup no matter who you are when you get smashed by forearms to the head.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum