Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
As you may know, a recount of the vote in Ohio has been petitioned for by the presidential candidates of the Green and Libertarian parties. The Ohio Democratic Party has now joined the effort.

Unfortunately, Ohio's secretary of state, Kenneth Blackwell, has decided that the recount cannot start until Dec 6., the date when the vote will be certified. Dec. 13 is the day the Electoral College votes, leaving only one week for the recount.

Provisional ballots are still being collected, and of course those can not be recounted until they are in, but can anyone find any reason why the recount shouldn't begin for the votes that are already in?

According to this article in Cleveland's The Plain Dealer:

Blackwell spokesman Carlo LoParo said the recount hasn't started because the ballots haven't been counted.

"It would be an amazing feat to recount something that hasn't yet been completely counted," LoParo said.


That's insane. By phrasing the votes as "something", as in a singular object, LoParo claims to make a logical argument. But of course votes are plural... and the recount applies to each individual vote, not the votes as a collective... therefore, it would not even remotely be an "amazing feat" to recount the votes that have already been counted.

Clearly, Blackwell is either idiotic or up to no good.

It should be noted that Blackwell was Bush's campaign manager in Ohio.

(Hmm... just like fmr Sec. of State Katherine Harris was Bush's campaign manager in Florida in 2000...)





More info about the recount can be found here at David Cobb's website:

http://www.votecobb.org


Last edited by Kenny on Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
Kenny wrote:
Unfortunately, Ohio's secretary of state, Kenneth Blackwell, has decided that the recount cannot start until Dec 6., the date when the vote will be certified. Dec. 13 is the day that Electoral College votes, leaving only one week for the recount.


Do you really think that a recount would even come close to turning around Ohio? If it was, then we'd be seeing a lot more aggressive progress on it, like in Florida.

That being said, I'm all in favor of a recount, but it shouldn't be limited to just Ohio. I bet every state has some voting error that happened.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
You Crane!

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
Green Habit wrote:
Kenny wrote:
Unfortunately, Ohio's secretary of state, Kenneth Blackwell, has decided that the recount cannot start until Dec 6., the date when the vote will be certified. Dec. 13 is the day that Electoral College votes, leaving only one week for the recount.


Do you really think that a recount would even come close to turning around Ohio? If it was, then we'd be seeing a lot more aggressive progress on it, like in Florida.

That being said, I'm all in favor of a recount, but it shouldn't be limited to just Ohio. I bet every state has some voting error that happened.


I don't think the election result will change, but I guess there's a chance.

If you look at David Cobb's site, he and Badnarik have now filed for a recount in Nevada and New Mexico. A recount in New Hampshire is underway thanks to a $2000 check from Ralph Nader.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:34 pm
Posts: 419
Green Habit wrote:
Kenny wrote:
Unfortunately, Ohio's secretary of state, Kenneth Blackwell, has decided that the recount cannot start until Dec 6., the date when the vote will be certified. Dec. 13 is the day that Electoral College votes, leaving only one week for the recount.


Do you really think that a recount would even come close to turning around Ohio? If it was, then we'd be seeing a lot more aggressive progress on it, like in Florida.

That being said, I'm all in favor of a recount, but it shouldn't be limited to just Ohio. I bet every state has some voting error that happened.


I think it has more to do with uncovering voter fraud, like a county saying there was a nonexistant terrorist threat so they had to cunt the votes behind locked doors without anyone else around, votes being counted twice,a ccidentally of course, miscallibrations with voting machines...all of which defy the laws of statistics going to Bush;s favor instead of a more even 50/50 error rate for both Bush and Kerry

_________________
"There are better things
to talk about
Be constructive
Bear witness
We can use
Be constructive
With yer blues
Even when it's only warnings
Even when you're talking war games"


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:53 am
Posts: 987
Can we rename this to the "Hopeless Endeavour Thread"?

_________________
Master of the interwebs.

http://www.lowercasejames.com


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
CommonWord wrote:
Can we rename this to the "Hopeless Endeavour Thread"?


Are you sure you love your country?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
OK, maybe my last post was too flippant, but CommonWord, what is so bad about wanting to make sure the election was accurate?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
Kenny wrote:
OK, maybe my last post was too flippant, but CommonWord, what is so bad about wanting to make sure the election was accurate?


if kerry won, would you be this adamant about a recount?

please dont respond, youre only lying to yourself ;)

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
Peeps wrote:
Kenny wrote:
OK, maybe my last post was too flippant, but CommonWord, what is so bad about wanting to make sure the election was accurate?


if kerry won, would you be this adamant about a recount?

please dont respond, youre only lying to yourself ;)



To be honest, I probably wouldn't clamour for a recount, but I wouldn't disregard it.

I'd say Kennedy wasn't really elected, and there have been many other fraudulent elections to get Democrats into office. Their political machine is no better than the Repulicans'.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 386
Location: Chicago area
Give it a rest. We voted for the town idiot.. again. Half of us are going to deserve what Bu$h has in store for us. There was voter frued on both sides. Voter freud should not be a concern. Half of us being idiots should be the concern. Why are these election so close?, if people pulled their heads out of their asses, we'd elect a leader with a majority of the votes and no questions to ask.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:53 am
Posts: 987
LikeAnOcean wrote:
Give it a rest. We voted for the town idiot.. again. Half of us are going to deserve what Bu$h has in store for us. There was voter frued on both sides. Voter freud should not be a concern. Half of us being idiots should be the concern. Why are these election so close?, if people pulled their heads out of their asses, we'd elect a leader with a majority of the votes and no questions to ask.


Before you accuse us of it, you better learn how to spell it, jackass.

Unless you meant:

Image

_________________
Master of the interwebs.

http://www.lowercasejames.com


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
Kenny wrote:
To be honest, I probably wouldn't clamour for a recount, but I wouldn't disregard it.

I'd say Kennedy wasn't really elected, and there have been many other fraudulent elections to get Democrats into office. Their political machine is no better than the Repulicans'.



atleast youre honest

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:34 pm
Posts: 419
CommonWord wrote:
LikeAnOcean wrote:
Give it a rest. We voted for the town idiot.. again. Half of us are going to deserve what Bu$h has in store for us. There was voter frued on both sides. Voter freud should not be a concern. Half of us being idiots should be the concern. Why are these election so close?, if people pulled their heads out of their asses, we'd elect a leader with a majority of the votes and no questions to ask.


Before you accuse us of it, you better learn how to spell it, jackass.


you seriously need to relax a little.

_________________
"There are better things
to talk about
Be constructive
Bear witness
We can use
Be constructive
With yer blues
Even when it's only warnings
Even when you're talking war games"


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:53 am
Posts: 987
VoiceOfReason wrote:
CommonWord wrote:
LikeAnOcean wrote:
Give it a rest. We voted for the town idiot.. again. Half of us are going to deserve what Bu$h has in store for us. There was voter frued on both sides. Voter freud should not be a concern. Half of us being idiots should be the concern. Why are these election so close?, if people pulled their heads out of their asses, we'd elect a leader with a majority of the votes and no questions to ask.


Before you accuse us of it, you better learn how to spell it, jackass.


you seriously need to relax a little.


I seriously don't.

_________________
Master of the interwebs.

http://www.lowercasejames.com


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am
Posts: 1311
Location: Lexington
Green Habit wrote:
Do you really think that a recount would even come close to turning around Ohio? If it was, then we'd be seeing a lot more aggressive progress on it, like in Florida.

That being said, I'm all in favor of a recount, but it shouldn't be limited to just Ohio. I bet every state has some voting error that happened.


Thats all that needed to be said, close this thread.

_________________
punkdavid wrote:
Make sure to bring a bottle of vitriol. And wear a condom so you don't insinuate her.

--PunkDavid


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Recount Thread
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Cameron's Stallion
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:44 pm
Posts: 753
deathbyflannel wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Do you really think that a recount would even come close to turning around Ohio? If it was, then we'd be seeing a lot more aggressive progress on it, like in Florida.

That being said, I'm all in favor of a recount, but it shouldn't be limited to just Ohio. I bet every state has some voting error that happened.


Thats all that needed to be said, close this thread.


Nah, because the recount isn't about voting errors, which are inevitable, it's about potential fraud.

For example, people have claimed that they hit the touchscreen space for Kerry and the screen jumped so that they hit Bush instead.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:34 pm
Posts: 419
CommonWord wrote:
VoiceOfReason wrote:
CommonWord wrote:
LikeAnOcean wrote:
Give it a rest. We voted for the town idiot.. again. Half of us are going to deserve what Bu$h has in store for us. There was voter frued on both sides. Voter freud should not be a concern. Half of us being idiots should be the concern. Why are these election so close?, if people pulled their heads out of their asses, we'd elect a leader with a majority of the votes and no questions to ask.


Before you accuse us of it, you better learn how to spell it, jackass.


you seriously need to relax a little.


I seriously don't.


I stand corrected then

_________________
"There are better things
to talk about
Be constructive
Bear witness
We can use
Be constructive
With yer blues
Even when it's only warnings
Even when you're talking war games"


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Devil's Advocate
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am
Posts: 18643
Location: Raleigh, NC
Gender: Male
Why the fuck are video games so advanced and we can't figure out an accurate way to count votes? We go to the moon but we can't count fucking votes. Unbelievable.

The real problem is that citizens aren't angry enough about how elections are done and are too angry about the resulting bullshit. It's like leaving a pizza in the oven for 2 days and being mad about eating the burned meal. Fuck, fix your oven.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:34 pm
Posts: 419
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Why the fuck are video games so advanced and we can't figure out an accurate way to count votes? We go to the moon but we can't count fucking votes. Unbelievable.

The real problem is that citizens aren't angry enough about how elections are done and are too angry about the resulting bullshit. It's like leaving a pizza in the oven for 2 days and being mad about eating the burned meal. Fuck, fix your oven.


fix their oven? The frozen pizza I get only takes 10-20 min, not 2 days :D

but i agree with you on everything else

_________________
"There are better things
to talk about
Be constructive
Bear witness
We can use
Be constructive
With yer blues
Even when it's only warnings
Even when you're talking war games"


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Wed Dec 03, 2025 10:17 pm